338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9660911)
1. A three year experience with the toronto stentless porcine valve.
Berg GA; McLaughlin KE; Akar R; Pathi V; MacArthur KJ
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 Jun; 4(3):138-45. PubMed ID: 9660911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized controlled trial of stented and stentless aortic bioprotheses: hemodynamic performance at 3 years.
Williams RJ; Muir DF; Pathi V; MacArthur K; Berg GA
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):93-7. PubMed ID: 10660174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve with the Toronto Stentless Porcine Valve.
Cohen G; Zagorski B; Christakis GT; Joyner CD; Vincent J; Sever J; Harbi S; Feder-Elituv R; Moussa F; Goldman BS; Fremes SE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Apr; 139(4):848-59. PubMed ID: 20080264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valves: a ten-year experience.
David TE; Feindel CM; Scully HE; Bos J; Rakowski H
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9651835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless valve: five-year follow up.
Nyawo B; Graham R; Hunter S
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jan; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17315382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stentless or stented aortic valve implants in elderly patients?
Van Nooten G; Caes F; François K; Van Belleghem Y; Taeymans Y
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Jan; 15(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10077370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aortic valve replacement with the Cryolife-O'Brien stentless aortic bioprosthesis: five-year experience.
Martinovic I; Farah I; Everlien M; Knez I; Greve HP; Vogt P
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2004 Dec; 45(6):557-63. PubMed ID: 15746635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of stentless versus stented valves on ventricular remodeling assessed at 6 months by magnetic resonance imaging and long-term follow-up.
Fouquet O; Baufreton C; Tassin A; Pinaud F; Binuani JP; DangVan S; Prunier F; Rouleau F; Willoteaux S; De Brux JL; Furber A
J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(1):264-271. PubMed ID: 27318406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves: a case-match study.
David TE; Puschmann R; Ivanov J; Bos J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Scully HE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1998 Aug; 116(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 9699575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical management of destructive aortic endocarditis: left ventricular outflow reconstruction with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless bioprosthesis†.
Sponga S; Daffarra C; Pavoni D; Vendramin I; Mazzaro E; Piani D; Nalli C; Nucifora G; Livi U
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jan; 49(1):242-8. PubMed ID: 25732971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stentless and stented aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: Factors affecting midterm clinical and hemodynamical outcome.
Bové T; Van Belleghem Y; François K; Caes F; Van Overbeke H; Van Nooten G
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Nov; 30(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 16950630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stentless aortic valve replacement: an update.
Kobayashi J
Vasc Health Risk Manag; 2011; 7():345-51. PubMed ID: 21731886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three years' experience with the sorin pericarbon stentless prosthesis: mid-term results with three different implantation techniques.
Nagy ZL; Bodi A; Len A; Balogh I; Peterffy A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 15700439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Are aortic valve reoperations after primary replacement with stentless heart valve prostheses more demanding than after stented biological prostheses?
Böning A; Niemann B; Ennker I; Richter M; Roth P; Ennker J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Sep; 62(6):475-81. PubMed ID: 24788704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experience with stentless aortic xenografts.
Luciani GB; Auriemma S; Casali G; Barozzi L; Lamascese N; Mazzucco A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):794-800. PubMed ID: 11128787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is routine use of stentless aortic prostheses justified in an elderly (aged > or =75 years) population?
Ali A; Kumar P; Athanasiou T; Halstead J; Ashrafian H; Ali Z; Kumar S; Theodorou P; Pepper JR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):64-70; discussion 70-1. PubMed ID: 15700438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement.
Jin XY; Zhang ZM; Gibson DG; Yacoub MH; Pepper JR
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Sep; 62(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 8783993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biological aortic valve replacement: advantages and optimal indications of stentless compared to stented valve substitutes. A review.
Tavakoli R; Danial P; Oudjana AH; Jamshidi P; Gassmann M; Leprince P; Lebreton G
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 May; 66(5):247-256. PubMed ID: 29322433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The subcoronary Toronto stentless versus supra-annular Perimount stented replacement aortic valve: early clinical and hemodynamic results of a randomized comparison in 160 patients.
Chambers JB; Rimington HM; Hodson F; Rajani R; Blauth CI
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Apr; 131(4):878-2. PubMed ID: 16580447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
