These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9661457)

  • 1. What happened to the midwife in the case of the woman forced to have a caesarean.
    Cronk M
    Nurs Times; 1998 May 20-26; 94(20):18. PubMed ID: 9661457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The right to say no.
    Ferguson P
    Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 10-16; 94(23):28-30. PubMed ID: 9687749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The midwife and moral dilemma.
    Barki PA
    Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ; 1997; (41):57-8. PubMed ID: 9136427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Legal issues. Refusal overruled.
    Dimond B
    Mod Midwife; 1996 Dec; 6(12):20-2. PubMed ID: 9052162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inside the womb, outside the law.
    Murphy D
    Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 10-16; 94(23):32. PubMed ID: 9687751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The law, the midwife and the Bill of Rights.
    Dimond B
    Mod Midwife; 1997 Oct; 7(10):20-1. PubMed ID: 9423424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compulsory caesareans: the last world?
    Dimond B
    Pract Midwife; 1998 Jun; 1(6):10-2. PubMed ID: 9735815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sheila Kitzinger's letter from Europe: court-ordered cesareans in the United Kingdom.
    Kitzinger S
    Birth; 1998 Sep; 25(3):202-3. PubMed ID: 9767224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The right to choose.
    Savage W
    Nurs Stand; 1998 May 20-26; 12(35):14. PubMed ID: 9687689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whose body is it, anyway?
    Hewson B
    Nurs Stand; 1997 May; 11(35):18. PubMed ID: 9239007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Worst case scenario. Supporting women who refuse a caesarean section.
    Lee G
    Pract Midwife; 1998; 1(7-8):28-9. PubMed ID: 10392145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Smoking, mother's rights and the maternity department.
    Dimond B
    Mod Midwife; 1996 Jun; 6(6):10-1. PubMed ID: 8717654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High Court endorses women's right to refuse treatment.
    Pract Midwife; 1998 Jun; 1(6):7. PubMed ID: 9735814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When pregnant women and their physicians disagree on the need for cesarean section: no simple solution.
    Catlin AJ
    Adv Pract Nurs Q; 1998; 4(2):23-9. PubMed ID: 9874946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Against her judgement.
    Beech BL; McCormick C; Savage W
    Nurs Times; 1996 Oct 9-15; 92(41):16-7. PubMed ID: 8932145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The review of the 1979 Nurses, Midwives and Health Visitors Act.
    Chaffer D
    Nurs Times; 1998 Feb 18-24; 94(7):45. PubMed ID: 9536733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Personal autonomy versus active management of labor.
    McLean MT
    Midwifery Today Childbirth Educ; 1994; (30):18. PubMed ID: 7920795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safe practice or prejudice?
    Dimond B
    Mod Midwife; 1997 Sep; 7(9):20-2. PubMed ID: 9370620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compulsory intervention during pregnancy.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1992 Oct; 340(8826):1029-30. PubMed ID: 1357414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Water births: client choice versus legal implications.
    Street D
    Nurs Times; 1997 Nov 5-11; 93(45):50-2. PubMed ID: 9407888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.