These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9661713)

  • 1. Constructing rater and task banks for performance assessments.
    Engelhard G
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 9661713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative analysis of the ratings in performance assessment using generalizability theory and the many-facet Rasch model.
    Kim SC; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):408-23. PubMed ID: 19934528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Many-facet Rasch analysis with crossed, nested, and mixed designs.
    Schumacker RE
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(4):323-38. PubMed ID: 10572385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using classical and modern measurement theories to explore rater, domain, and gender influences on student writing ability.
    Gyagenda IS; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):225-46. PubMed ID: 19671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of rater effects on weighted composite scores under nested and spiraled scoring designs, using the multifaceted Rasch model.
    Taherbhai HM; Young MJ
    J Outcome Meas; 2001-2002; 5(1):819-38. PubMed ID: 16320551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Construct validity of scores/measures from a developmental assessment in mathematics using classical and many-facet Rasch measurement.
    Banerji M
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):177-98. PubMed ID: 12029177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining rating quality in writing assessment: rater agreement, error, and accuracy.
    Wind SA; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):321-35. PubMed ID: 23270978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Item and rater analysis of constructed response items via the multi-faceted Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 19671993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rasch techniques for detecting bias in performance assessments: an example comparing the performance of native and non-native speakers on a test of academic English.
    Elder C; McNamara T; Congdon P
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):181-97. PubMed ID: 12748409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating cognitive theory: a joint modeling approach using responses and response times.
    Klein Entink RH; Kuhn JT; Hornke LF; Fox JP
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Mar; 14(1):54-75. PubMed ID: 19271848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining rating scales using Rasch and Mokken models for rater-mediated assessments.
    Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):100-32. PubMed ID: 24950531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability: on the reproducibility of assessment data.
    Downing SM
    Med Educ; 2004 Sep; 38(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 15327684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing holistic and analytic scoring for performance assessment with many-facet Rasch model.
    Chi E
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 12011505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Substantive scale construction.
    Stone MH
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(3):282-97. PubMed ID: 12904678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using paired comparison matrices to estimate parameters of the partial credit Rasch measurement model for rater-mediated assessments.
    Garner M; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 19299883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting differential rater functioning over time (DRIFT) using a Rasch multi-faceted rating scale model.
    Wolfe EW; Moulder BC; Myford CM
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(3):256-80. PubMed ID: 12011510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Historical view of the influences of measurement and reading theories on the assessment of reading.
    Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 12000854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Equating designs and procedures used in Rasch scaling.
    Skaggs G; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(2):182-95. PubMed ID: 20693702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Performance assessment using the Many-Facet Rasch Measurement].
    Prieto Adánez G
    Psicothema; 2011 Apr; 23(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 21504675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensionality of an early childhood scale using rasch analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Banerji M; Smith RM; Dedrick RF
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(1):56-85. PubMed ID: 9661715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.