These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9661719)

  • 21. Test equating in the presence of DIF items.
    Chu KL; Kamata A
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):342-54. PubMed ID: 15942075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why measurement matters for measuring patient vision outcomes.
    Mallinson T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 17700332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of proficiency in an anesthesiology course across distinct medical student cohorts: psychometric approaches to test equating.
    Liao SW; Chang KY; Ting CK; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang WK
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 77(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 24290232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):409-34. PubMed ID: 12077465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparing screening approaches to investigate stability of common items in Rasch equating.
    Arce-Ferrer AJ
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 18180550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison between robust z and 0.3-Logit Difference procedures in assessing stability of linking items for the Rasch model.
    Huynh H; Rawls A
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 22089507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measuring disability in Medicare home care patients: application of Rasch modeling to the outcome and assessment information set.
    Fortinsky RH; Garcia RI; Joseph Sheehan T; Madigan EA; Tullai-McGuinness S
    Med Care; 2003 May; 41(5):601-15. PubMed ID: 12719685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Activity outcome measurement for postacute care.
    Haley SM; Coster WJ; Andres PL; Ludlow LH; Ni P; Bond TL; Sinclair SJ; Jette AM
    Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I49-61. PubMed ID: 14707755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the lack of comonotonicity between likert scores and Rasch-based measures.
    Bertoli-Barsotti L
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 15701945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Expanding an existing multiple choice test with a mixed format test: simulation study on sample size and item recovery in concurrent calibration.
    Paek I; Young MJ
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(4):394-406. PubMed ID: 17068379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of decision consistency indices for complex assessments: model based approaches.
    Stearns M; Smith RM
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(3):305-15. PubMed ID: 18753697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The efficacy of link items in the construction of a numeracy achievement scale--from kindergarten to year 6.
    Looveer J; Mulligan J
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):247-65. PubMed ID: 19671988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Moving the cut score on Rasch scored tests.
    Miller GE; Beretvas SN
    J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(3):272-81. PubMed ID: 12147913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Utilizing Rasch measurement models to develop a computer adaptive self-report of walking, climbing, and running.
    Velozo CA; Wang Y; Lehman L; Wang JH
    Disabil Rehabil; 2008; 30(6):458-67. PubMed ID: 18297500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Equating the MOS SF36 and the LSU HSI Physical Functioning Scales.
    Fisher WP; Eubanks RL; Marier RL
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(4):329-62. PubMed ID: 9661727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bookmark locations and item response model selection in the presence of local item dependence.
    Skaggs G
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 17215566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Content development of the Optometric Patient Anxiety Scale.
    Court H; Greenland K; Margrain TH
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Aug; 84(8):729-37. PubMed ID: 17700326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The computation of equating errors in international surveys in education.
    Monseur C; Berezner A
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):323-35. PubMed ID: 17804897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example.
    Hagquist C; Bruce M; Gustavsson JP
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):380-93. PubMed ID: 19059593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Item and rater analysis of constructed response items via the multi-faceted Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 19671993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.