These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9661731)

  • 61. Using Rasch analysis to revisit the validity of the Cataract TyPE Spec instrument for measuring cataract surgery outcomes.
    Gothwal VK; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1509-17. PubMed ID: 19683146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A bootstrap approach to evaluating person and item fit to the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 23442324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Analyzing nonadditive conjoint structures: compounding events by Rasch model probabilities.
    Karabatsos G
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(3):191-221. PubMed ID: 9711021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Measuring disability: application of the Rasch model to activities of daily living (ADL/IADL).
    Sheehan TJ; DeChello LM; Garcia R; Fifield J; Rothfield N; Reisine S
    J Outcome Meas; 2001-2002; 5(1):839-63. PubMed ID: 16320552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. A comparison of the psychometric properties of three- and four-option multiple-choice questions in nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2010 Aug; 30(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 20053488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Psychometric properties of a modified US-household food security survey module in Campinas, Brazil.
    Melgar-Quinonez HR; Nord M; Perez-Escamilla R; Segall-Correa AM
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2008 May; 62(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 17440521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Psychometric aspects of item mapping for criterion-referenced interpretation and bookmark standard setting.
    Huynh H
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 20351450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A new class of parametric IRT models for dichotomous item scores.
    Hessen DJ
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(4):385-97. PubMed ID: 15496746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Mixed model estimation methods for the Rasch model.
    Rijmen F; Tuerlinckx F; Meulders M; Smits DJ; Balázs K
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):273-88. PubMed ID: 15942071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Rasch analysis of the quality of life and vision function questionnaire.
    Gothwal VK; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 86(7):E836-44. PubMed ID: 19521266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. [Goodness of fit in polytomous items: Type I error rates and empirical power for three fit-indexes].
    Sueiro MJ; Abad FJ
    Psicothema; 2009 Nov; 21(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 19861112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Identifying the most efficient items from the Mini-Mental State Examination for cognitive function assessment in older Taiwanese patients.
    Lou MF; Dai YT; Huang GS; Yu PJ
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Mar; 16(3):502-8. PubMed ID: 17335526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Using paired comparison matrices to estimate parameters of the partial credit Rasch measurement model for rater-mediated assessments.
    Garner M; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 19299883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Rasch measurement for reducing the items of the Nottingham Health Profile.
    Prieto L; Alonso J; Lamarca R; Wright BD
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(4):285-301. PubMed ID: 9803716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Maintaining instrument quality while reducing items: application of Rasch analysis to a self-report of visual function.
    Velozo CA; Lai JS; Mallinson T; Hauselman E
    J Outcome Meas; 2000-2001; 4(3):667-80. PubMed ID: 11253902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
    Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Development of a comprehensiveness of Rasch measurement application scale.
    Lamprianou I
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(1):92-116. PubMed ID: 16385153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Using Rasch scaled stage scores to validate orders of hierarchical complexity of balance beam task sequences.
    Commons ML; Goodheart EA; Pekker A; Dawson TL; Draney K; Adams KM
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(2):182-99. PubMed ID: 18480514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Expanding an existing multiple choice test with a mixed format test: simulation study on sample size and item recovery in concurrent calibration.
    Paek I; Young MJ
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(4):394-406. PubMed ID: 17068379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Measuring disability: application of the Rasch model to activities of daily living (ADL/IADL).
    Sheehan TJ; DeChello LM; Garcia R; Fifield J; Rothfield N; Reisine S
    J Outcome Meas; 2000-2001; 4(3):681-705. PubMed ID: 11253903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.