These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9661734)
1. The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations. Halkitis PN J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 9661734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polytomous modeling of cognitive errors in computer adaptive testing. Wang L; Li CS J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):356-78. PubMed ID: 12011504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm? Wagner-Menghin MM; Masters GN J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 23816590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An examination of exposure control and content balancing restrictions on item selection in CATs using the partial credit model. Davis LL; Pastor DA; Dodd BG; Chiang C; Fitzpatrick SJ J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(1):24-42. PubMed ID: 12700429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The transition of the national certification examination from paper and pencil to computer adaptive testing. Zaglaniczny KL AANA J; 1996 Feb; 64(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8928607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utilizing Rasch measurement models to develop a computer adaptive self-report of walking, climbing, and running. Velozo CA; Wang Y; Lehman L; Wang JH Disabil Rehabil; 2008; 30(6):458-67. PubMed ID: 18297500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement precision and efficiency of multidimensional computer adaptive testing of physical functioning using the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Haley SM; Ni P; Ludlow LH; Fragala-Pinkham MA Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 87(9):1223-9. PubMed ID: 16935059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: a simulation study. Smits N; Cuijpers P; van Straten A Psychiatry Res; 2011 Jun; 188(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 21208660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computerized adaptive testing: a mixture item selection approach for constrained situations. Leung CK; Chang HH; Hau KT Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 Nov; 58(Pt 2):239-57. PubMed ID: 16293199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates. Smith RM; Suh KK J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impact of Item Parameter Drift in Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT). Risk N J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):54-78. PubMed ID: 26784378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Features of the sampling distribution of the ability estimate in computerized adaptive testing according to two stopping rules. Blais JG; Raiche G J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(4):424-31. PubMed ID: 21164229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric aspects of item mapping for criterion-referenced interpretation and bookmark standard setting. Huynh H J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 20351450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Downing SM Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Binary items and beyond: a simulation of computer adaptive testing using the Rasch partial credit model. Lange R J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):81-104. PubMed ID: 18180552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items. He Q; Wheadon C J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing measurement of vision-related quality of life: a computerized adaptive test for the impact of vision impairment questionnaire (IVI-CAT). Fenwick EK; Loe BS; Khadka J; Man REK; Rees G; Lamoureux EL Qual Life Res; 2020 Mar; 29(3):765-774. PubMed ID: 31707693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combining CAT with cognitive diagnosis: a weighted item selection approach. Wang C; Chang HH; Douglas J Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 21853408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations. Lunz ME; Bergstrom BA J Allied Health; 1991; 20(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 2045351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing single-pool and multiple-pool designs regarding test security in computerized testing. Zhang J; Chang HH; Yi Q Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):742-52. PubMed ID: 22218817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]