270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9662594)
1. Whole-body positron emission tomography using fluorodeoxyglucose for staging of lymphoma: effectiveness and comparison with computed tomography.
Stumpe KD; Urbinelli M; Steinert HC; Glanzmann C; Buck A; von Schulthess GK
Eur J Nucl Med; 1998 Jul; 25(7):721-8. PubMed ID: 9662594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin disease: coregistered FDG PET and CT at staging and restaging--do we need contrast-enhanced CT?
Schaefer NG; Hany TF; Taverna C; Seifert B; Stumpe KD; von Schulthess GK; Goerres GW
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):823-9. PubMed ID: 15273335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of whole-body 18F-FDP-PET for restaging malignant lymphoma.
Mikosch P; Gallowitsch HJ; Zinke-Cerwenka W; Heinisch M; Pipam W; Eibl M; Kresnik E; Unterweger O; Linkesch W; Lind P
Acta Med Austriaca; 2003; 30(2):41-7. PubMed ID: 12752087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Whole-body positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for posttreatment evaluation in Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has higher diagnostic and prognostic value than classical computed tomography scan imaging.
Jerusalem G; Beguin Y; Fassotte MF; Najjar F; Paulus P; Rigo P; Fillet G
Blood; 1999 Jul; 94(2):429-33. PubMed ID: 10397709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of whole-body [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and conventional techniques in the staging of patients with Hodgkin and aggressive non Hodgkin lymphoma.
Pelosi E; Pregno P; Penna D; Deandreis D; Chiappella A; Limerutti G; Vitolo U; Mancini M; Bisi G; Gallo E
Radiol Med; 2008 Jun; 113(4):578-90. PubMed ID: 18414808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and Ga-67 scintigraphy in evaluation of lymphoma.
Kostakoglu L; Leonard JP; Kuji I; Coleman M; Vallabhajosula S; Goldsmith SJ
Cancer; 2002 Feb; 94(4):879-88. PubMed ID: 11920454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [(18)F]FDG in childhood lymphoma: clinical utility and impact on management.
Montravers F; McNamara D; Landman-Parker J; Grahek D; Kerrou K; Younsi N; Wioland M; Leverger G; Talbot JN
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Sep; 29(9):1155-65. PubMed ID: 12192560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinical value of FDG PET using coincident gamma cameras in staging and restaging of malignant lymphoma--compared with convenitonal diagnostic methods].
Pichler R; Maschek W; Hatzl-Griesenhofer M; Huber H; Wimmer G; Wahl G; Fridrik M
Nuklearmedizin; 2000 Sep; 39(6):166-73. PubMed ID: 11057408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Whole-body MRI versus an [
Spijkers S; Littooij AS; Kwee TC; Tolboom N; Beishuizen A; Bruin MCA; Enríquez G; Sábado C; Miller E; Granata C; de Lange C; Verzegnassi F; de Keizer B; Nievelstein RAJ
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):8925-8936. PubMed ID: 34021390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and gallium-67 citrate scintigraphy for detecting malignant lymphoma.
Shen YY; Kao A; Yen RF
Oncol Rep; 2002; 9(2):321-5. PubMed ID: 11836600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lymphoma: role of whole-body 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) PET in nodal staging.
Moog F; Bangerter M; Diederichs CG; Guhlmann A; Kotzerke J; Merkle E; Kolokythas O; Herrmann F; Reske SN
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):795-800. PubMed ID: 9169707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Computerized tomography and F-18-FDG positron emission tomography in staging of malignant lymphomas: a comparison].
Bumann D; de Wit M; Beyer W; Beese M; Lübeck M; Bücheler E; Clausen M
Rofo; 1998 May; 168(5):457-65. PubMed ID: 9617362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Staging in childhood lymphoma: differences between FDG-PET and CT.
Hermann S; Wormanns D; Pixberg M; Hunold A; Heindel W; Jürgens H; Schober O; Franzius C
Nuklearmedizin; 2005 Feb; 44(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 15711722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 18F-FDG PET in malignant lymphoma: significance of positive findings.
Castellucci P; Zinzani P; Pourdehnad M; Alinari L; Nanni C; Farsad M; Battista G; Tani M; Stefoni V; Canini R; Monetti N; Rubello D; Alavi A; Franchi R; Fanti S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2005 Jul; 32(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 15785956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frequent impact of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography on the staging and management of patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Blum RH; Seymour JF; Wirth A; MacManus M; Hicks RJ
Clin Lymphoma; 2003 Jun; 4(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 12837154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whole-body FDG-PET imaging for staging of Hodgkin's disease and lymphoma.
Hoh CK; Glaspy J; Rosen P; Dahlbom M; Lee SJ; Kunkel L; Hawkin RA; Maddahi J; Phelps ME
J Nucl Med; 1997 Mar; 38(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 9074514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic significance of positron emission tomography using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients treated for malignant lymphoma.
Cremerius U; Fabry U; Neuerburg J; Zimny M; Bares R; Osieka R; Büll U
Nuklearmedizin; 2001 Feb; 40(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 11373935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nodal staging of lymphoma with whole-body PET: comparison of.
Sutinen E; Jyrkkiö S; Varpula M; Lindholm P; Grönroos T; Lehikoinen P; Teräs M; Minn H
J Nucl Med; 2000 Dec; 41(12):1980-8. PubMed ID: 11138682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Whole-body hybrid PET with 18F-FDG in the staging of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Tatsumi M; Kitayama H; Sugahara H; Tokita N; Nakamura H; Kanakura Y; Nishimura T
J Nucl Med; 2001 Apr; 42(4):601-8. PubMed ID: 11337549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
