185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9663038)
1. Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus grafting: comparative histomorphometric findings in sheep.
Haas R; Donath K; Födinger M; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Apr; 9(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 9663038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus augmentation: analysis of interfacial bond strength of dental implants using pull-out tests.
Haas R; Mailath G; Dörtbudak O; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Apr; 9(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 9663039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus in sheep: comparative pullout study of dental implants.
Haas R; Baron M; Zechner W; Mailath-Pokorny G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):691-6. PubMed ID: 14579957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Freeze-dried homogeneous and heterogeneous bone for sinus augmentation in sheep. Part I: histological findings.
Haas R; Haidvogl D; Donath K; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):396-404. PubMed ID: 12175377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Freeze-dried bone for maxillary sinus augmentation in sheep. Part II: biomechanical findings.
Haas R; Haidvogl D; Dörtbudak O; Mailath G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Dec; 13(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 12519331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part III. Evaluation of autogenous bone combined with porous hydroxyapatite.
Hürzeler MB; Quiñones CR; Kirsch A; Schüpbach P; Krausse A; Strub JR; Caffesse RG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Oct; 8(5):401-11. PubMed ID: 9612145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone apposition onto oral implants in the sinus area filled with different grafting materials. A histological study in beagle dogs.
Wetzel AC; Stich H; Caffesse RG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1995 Sep; 6(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 7578791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study.
Benlidayi ME; Kürkcü M; Oz IA; Sertdemir Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):704-11. PubMed ID: 19885412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.
Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part IV. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite-coated implants.
Quiñones CR; Hürzeler MB; Schüpbach P; Arnold DR; Strub JR; Caffesse RG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 9580409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part I. Evaluation of anorganic bovine-derived bone matrix.
Hürzeler MB; Quiñones CR; Kirsch A; Gloker C; Schüpbach P; Strub JR; Caffesse RG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):476-86. PubMed ID: 9580407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-stage sinus augmentation with cancellous iliac bone and anorganic bovine bone in the presence of platelet-rich plasma in the miniature pig.
Roldán JC; Knueppel H; Schmidt C; Jepsen S; Zimmermann C; Terheyden H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 18261122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and osseointegrated dental implants in monkeys. Part II. Evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite as a grafting material.
Quiñones CR; Hürzeler MB; Schüpbach P; Kirsch A; Blum P; Caffesse RG; Strub JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):487-96. PubMed ID: 9580408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of early osseointegration of SLA
Alayan J; Vaquette C; Saifzadeh S; Hutmacher D; Ivanovski S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1325-1333. PubMed ID: 27683194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The correlation of bone mineral density and histologic data in the early grafted maxillary sinus: a preliminary report.
Lee CY; Prasad HS; Suzuki JB; Stover JD; Rohrer MD
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):202-14. PubMed ID: 21613947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone reformation and implant integration following maxillary sinus membrane elevation: an experimental study in primates.
Palma VC; Magro-Filho O; de Oliveria JA; Lundgren S; Salata LA; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 16681489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sinus grafting with autogenous platelet-rich plasma and bovine hydroxyapatite. A histomorphometric study in minipigs.
Fürst G; Gruber R; Tangl S; Zechner W; Haas R; Mailath G; Sanroman F; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 12869013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
