110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9663039)
1. Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus augmentation: analysis of interfacial bond strength of dental implants using pull-out tests.
Haas R; Mailath G; Dörtbudak O; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Apr; 9(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 9663039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus grafting: comparative histomorphometric findings in sheep.
Haas R; Donath K; Födinger M; Watzek G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Apr; 9(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 9663038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Freeze-dried bone for maxillary sinus augmentation in sheep. Part II: biomechanical findings.
Haas R; Haidvogl D; Dörtbudak O; Mailath G
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Dec; 13(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 12519331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus in sheep: comparative pullout study of dental implants.
Haas R; Baron M; Zechner W; Mailath-Pokorny G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):691-6. PubMed ID: 14579957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part III. Evaluation of autogenous bone combined with porous hydroxyapatite.
Hürzeler MB; Quiñones CR; Kirsch A; Schüpbach P; Krausse A; Strub JR; Caffesse RG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Oct; 8(5):401-11. PubMed ID: 9612145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part IV. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite-coated implants.
Quiñones CR; Hürzeler MB; Schüpbach P; Arnold DR; Strub JR; Caffesse RG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 9580409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part I. Evaluation of anorganic bovine-derived bone matrix.
Hürzeler MB; Quiñones CR; Kirsch A; Gloker C; Schüpbach P; Strub JR; Caffesse RG
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):476-86. PubMed ID: 9580407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maxillary sinus augmentation using different grafting materials and osseointegrated dental implants in monkeys. Part II. Evaluation of porous hydroxyapatite as a grafting material.
Quiñones CR; Hürzeler MB; Schüpbach P; Kirsch A; Blum P; Caffesse RG; Strub JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997 Dec; 8(6):487-96. PubMed ID: 9580408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-stage sinus augmentation with cancellous iliac bone and anorganic bovine bone in the presence of platelet-rich plasma in the miniature pig.
Roldán JC; Knueppel H; Schmidt C; Jepsen S; Zimmermann C; Terheyden H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 18261122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone.
Hallman M; Hedin M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Mar; 60(3):277-84; discussion 285-6. PubMed ID: 11887139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with dental implants in the augmented maxillary sinus: a 5-year clinical investigation.
Hürzeler MB; Kirsch A; Ackermann KL; Quiñones CR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):466-75. PubMed ID: 8803342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.
Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study.
Mangano C; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 18271380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of low-level laser treatment on bone regeneration and osseointegration of dental implants following sinus augmentation. An experimental study on sheep.
Jakse N; Payer M; Tangl S; Berghold A; Kirmeier R; Lorenzoni M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 17451409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maxillary sinus augmentation with autologous bone harvested from the lateral maxillary wall combined with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: clinical and histologic observations.
de Vicente JC; Hernández-Vallejo G; Braña-Abascal P; Peña I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Apr; 21(4):430-8. PubMed ID: 20443796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Human histologic evidence of integration of functionally loaded hydroxyapatite-coated implants placed simultaneously with sinus augmentation: a case report 2 1/2 years postplacement.
Rosenlicht JL; Tarnow DP
J Oral Implantol; 1999; 25(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 10483421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study.
Benlidayi ME; Kürkcü M; Oz IA; Sertdemir Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):704-11. PubMed ID: 19885412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
