These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9663114)

  • 1. Impression technique for arches requiring both implant and natural tooth restorations.
    Chee WW; Alexander ML
    J Prosthodont; 1998 Mar; 7(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 9663114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of splint material rigidity in implant impression techniques.
    Del Acqua MA; Chavez AM; Castanharo SM; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1153-8. PubMed ID: 21197492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A combined impression technique for a partial implant-supported fixed-detachable restoration.
    Kohavi D
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Mar; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 9452684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utilization of digital technologies for fabrication of definitive implant-supported restorations.
    Ramsey CD; Ritter RG
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Oct; 24(5):299-308. PubMed ID: 23025311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant-retained partial overdenture with resilient attachments.
    Chikunov I; Doan P; Vahidi F
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):141-148. PubMed ID: 18005337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relevance of a new generation of monobloc posts and impression copings for implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a 2-year clinical prospective study with the FM-Clip system on EVL implants (SERF).
    Leclercq P; Zenati C; Dohan DM
    J Oral Implantol; 2006; 32(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 17069170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A technique for managing and accurate registration of periimplant soft tissues.
    Ntounis A; Petropoulou A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Oct; 104(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 20875533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A modified impression technique for implant-supported restoration.
    Assif D; Marshak B; Nissan J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jun; 71(6):589-91. PubMed ID: 8040821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should natural teeth and osseointegrated implants be used in combination to support a fixed prosthesis?
    Clepper DP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):855-9. PubMed ID: 9425768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method for fabrication of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Zafiropoulos GG; Hoffmann O; Deli G
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jun; 40(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 24914913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro comparison of master cast accuracy for single-tooth implant replacement.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 May; 83(5):562-6. PubMed ID: 10793389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A modified impression technique for accurate registration of peri-implant soft tissues.
    Attard N; Barzilay I
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Feb; 69(2):80-3. PubMed ID: 12559055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Custom copings for accurate impressions of multiple internal connection implants.
    Ntounis A; Pelekanos S
    Implant Dent; 2010 Oct; 19(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 20881806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of implant impressions without impression copings: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Kwon JH; Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):367-73. PubMed ID: 21640237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.