These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9663114)

  • 21. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does Splinting the Direct Copings Increase the Impression Accuracy of Two-Unit Nonparallel Implant Restorations? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ma Y; Al-Radhi RYZ; Jiang L; Yu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):653-659. PubMed ID: 35904821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fabricating a stable record base for completely edentulous patients treated with osseointegrated implants using healing abutments.
    Rungcharassaeng K; Kan JY
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Feb; 81(2):224-7. PubMed ID: 9922438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Splinting osseointegrated implants and natural teeth in rehabilitation of partially edentulous patients. Part I: laboratory and clinical studies.
    Gross M; Laufer BZ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Nov; 24(11):863-70. PubMed ID: 9426169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Wax teeth and metallic superstructure trials at the same session: simplified technique for implant-supported prosthesis.
    Margonar R; de Almeida EO; Queiroz TP; Marcantonio E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1960-2. PubMed ID: 21119469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients.
    Gallucci GO; Papaspyridakos P; Ashy LM; Kim GE; Brady NJ; Weber HP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):469-72. PubMed ID: 21909490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Early functional loading at 5 days for Brånemark implants placed into edentulous mandibles: a prospective, open-ended, longitudinal study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Huffstetlert S
    J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 12816303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fixed partial denture or single-tooth implant restoration? Statistical considerations for sequencing and treatment.
    Salinas TJ; Block MS; Sadan A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Sep; 62(9 Suppl 2):2-16. PubMed ID: 15332176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of replacing three tapered transfer impression copings in two elastomeric impression materials.
    Liou AD; Nicholls JI; Yuodelis RA; Brudvik JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 8240649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Syncrystallization: a technique for temporization of immediately loaded implants with metal-reinforced acrylic resin restorations.
    Degidi M; Gehrke P; Spanel A; Piattelli A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):123-34. PubMed ID: 16919020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Impression technics in implantology].
    Vanheusden A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2001; 56(3):189-203. PubMed ID: 16193852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Guidelines for splinting implants.
    Becker CM; Kaiser DA; Jones JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 10946340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An accurate, single, platform-level impression technique for the fabrication of prosthetic restorations on dental implants.
    Marder MZ; Marder RW
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Oct; 25(5):495-9. PubMed ID: 16250571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new gingival retraction impression system for a one-stage root-form implant.
    Jones JD; Kaiser DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Sep; 80(3):371-3. PubMed ID: 9760372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. One-step fixed edentulous implant impressions and maxillomandibular jaw relationships: technical note.
    Dario LJ
    Implant Dent; 1996; 5(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 9151613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 15523336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rigid connections between natural teeth and implants: a technical note.
    Lindh T; Gunne J; Danielsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(5):674-8. PubMed ID: 9337030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.