These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom. Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study. Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of chest films of equalization radiography (advanced multiple beam equalization radiography). Comparison by means of a receiver operating characteristic study of simulated nodular interstitial disease. Schultz Kool LJ; van Proosdij M; van Metter R; Vrooman HA; Aarts NJ; Shaw PM; Obermann WR; Heijboer RJ; Memel DS; Oestmann JW Invest Radiol; 1994 Dec; 29(12):1020-5. PubMed ID: 7721542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study. Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fundamental and clinical evaluation of chest computed tomography imaging in detectability of pulmonary nodule. Milla N; Ito K; Ikeda M; Nakamura K; Hirose M; Ishigaki T Nagoya J Med Sci; 1994 Dec; 57(3-4):127-32. PubMed ID: 7898568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The value of the AMBER system in demonstrating intrathoracic space-occupying lesions. A comparative ROC study of the AMBER and conventional technics for postero-anterior views of the thorax. Advanced Multiple Beam Equalization Radiography]. Bitzer M; Strayle M; Schäfer C; Walter E; Brambs HJ; Claussen CD Rofo; 1993 Nov; 159(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 8219136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER) in the detection of diffuse lung disease. Hansell DM; Coleman R; du Bois RM; Carr DH; Goodman LR; Kerr IH; Pearson MC; Rubens MB Clin Radiol; 1991 Oct; 44(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 1959297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems. Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for lung cancer with digital chest radiography: sensitivity and number of secondary work-up CT examinations. de Hoop B; Schaefer-Prokop C; Gietema HA; de Jong PA; van Ginneken B; van Klaveren RJ; Prokop M Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):629-37. PubMed ID: 20413773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom. Kroft LJ; Geleijns J; Mertens BJ; Veldkamp WJ; Zonderland HM; de Roos A Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film. Cox GG; Cook LT; McMillan JH; Rosenthal SJ; Dwyer SJ Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):771-6. PubMed ID: 2389035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chest imaging with a selenium detector versus conventional film radiography: a CT-controlled study. van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 8756915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]