279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9663191)
1. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography: receiver operating characteristic comparison with screen-film chest radiography.
Swensen SJ; Aughenbaugh GL; Brown LR; Harms GF; Karsell PR; Gray JE; Ilstrup DM; Hodge DO
Mayo Clin Proc; 1998 Jul; 73(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 9663191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of chest films of equalization radiography (advanced multiple beam equalization radiography). Comparison by means of a receiver operating characteristic study of simulated nodular interstitial disease.
Schultz Kool LJ; van Proosdij M; van Metter R; Vrooman HA; Aarts NJ; Shaw PM; Obermann WR; Heijboer RJ; Memel DS; Oestmann JW
Invest Radiol; 1994 Dec; 29(12):1020-5. PubMed ID: 7721542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fundamental and clinical evaluation of chest computed tomography imaging in detectability of pulmonary nodule.
Milla N; Ito K; Ikeda M; Nakamura K; Hirose M; Ishigaki T
Nagoya J Med Sci; 1994 Dec; 57(3-4):127-32. PubMed ID: 7898568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of CT-proved pulmonary nodules: comparison of selenium-based digital and conventional screen-film chest radiographs.
Woodard PK; Slone RM; Sagel SS; Fleishman MJ; Gutierrez FR; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
Radiology; 1998 Dec; 209(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 9844662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The value of the AMBER system in demonstrating intrathoracic space-occupying lesions. A comparative ROC study of the AMBER and conventional technics for postero-anterior views of the thorax. Advanced Multiple Beam Equalization Radiography].
Bitzer M; Strayle M; Schäfer C; Walter E; Brambs HJ; Claussen CD
Rofo; 1993 Nov; 159(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 8219136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advanced multiple beam equalization radiography (AMBER) in the detection of diffuse lung disease.
Hansell DM; Coleman R; du Bois RM; Carr DH; Goodman LR; Kerr IH; Pearson MC; Rubens MB
Clin Radiol; 1991 Oct; 44(4):227-31. PubMed ID: 1959297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for lung cancer with digital chest radiography: sensitivity and number of secondary work-up CT examinations.
de Hoop B; Schaefer-Prokop C; Gietema HA; de Jong PA; van Ginneken B; van Klaveren RJ; Prokop M
Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):629-37. PubMed ID: 20413773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography for detection of simulated nodules and interstitial disease in a chest phantom.
Kroft LJ; Geleijns J; Mertens BJ; Veldkamp WJ; Zonderland HM; de Roos A
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):156-63. PubMed ID: 14990807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film.
Cox GG; Cook LT; McMillan JH; Rosenthal SJ; Dwyer SJ
Radiology; 1990 Sep; 176(3):771-6. PubMed ID: 2389035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chest imaging with a selenium detector versus conventional film radiography: a CT-controlled study.
van Heesewijk HP; van der Graaf Y; de Valois JC; Vos JA; Feldberg MA
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):687-90. PubMed ID: 8756915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alveolar consolidation detection: advanced multiple beam equalization radiography versus conventional chest radiography.
Nichols RD; Gurney JW; Jones KK; Robbins RA; Rennard SI
Radiology; 1993 Apr; 187(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 8451438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
Thaete FL; Fuhrman CR; Oliver JH; Britton CA; Campbell WL; Feist JH; Straub WH; Davis PL; Plunkett MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Image-intensifier photofluorography and conventional chest radiography: comparison of diagnostic efficacy.
Manninen H; Partanen K; Soimakallio S; Rytkönen H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Mar; 150(3):539-44. PubMed ID: 3257605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Experimental and clinical studies on utility of advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary mass lesions].
Itouji E; Kono M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1252-62. PubMed ID: 7610028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
