303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9663576)
21. Changes in bite force and dentoskeletal morphology in prognathic patients after orthognathic surgery.
Harada K; Kikuchi T; Morishima S; Sato M; Ohkura K; Omura K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 12789142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A multiparametric analysis of occlusal and periodontal jaw reflex characteristics in adult skeletal mandibular protrusion before and after orthognathic surgery.
Suda S; MacHida N; Momose M; Yamaki M; Seki Y; Yoshie H; Hanada K; Hara K
J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Aug; 26(8):686-90. PubMed ID: 10447825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A long-term comparative study of two rigid internal fixation techniques in terms of masticatory function and neurosensory disturbance after mandibular correction by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Yamashita Y; Otsuka T; Shigematsu M; Goto M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 21185151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bite force changes after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism in subjects with increased vertical dimension : A prospective clinical trial.
Tamimi ZZ; Abu Alhaija ES; AlWahadni AM; Al-Ajlouni Y
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jul; 84(4):216-224. PubMed ID: 34463788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Changes in masticatory function after orthognathic treatment in patients with mandibular prognathism.
Kobayashi T; Honma K; Shingaki S; Nakajima T
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 39(4):260-5. PubMed ID: 11437420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bite forces before and after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism.
Ellis E; Throckmorton GS; Sinn DP
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Feb; 54(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 8604066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The evaluation of jaw function subsequent to bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
Yang XW; Dong YJ; Long X; Zhang GZ; Kao CT
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jul; 100(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 15953911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Tongue-palatal contact changes in patients with skeletal mandibular prognathism after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an electropalatography study.
Kojima S; Kaku M; Yamamoto I; Yasuhara Y; Sumi H; Yamamoto T; Yashima Y; Izumino J; Nakajima K; Nagano Y; Kono M; Yoshimura A; Ueasa M; Tanimoto K
J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Sep; 44(9):673-682. PubMed ID: 28581686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Relapse of skeletal class III with anterior open bite after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery depending on maxillary posterior impaction and mandibular counterclockwise rotation.
Kor HS; Yang HJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e230-8. PubMed ID: 24954529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Morphologic and functional implications of the surgical-orthodontic management of mandibular prognathism: a comprehensive review.
Athanasiou AE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 May; 103(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 8480712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship between the morphologies of the masseter muscle and the ramus and occlusal force in patients with mandibular prognathism.
Ueki K; Takazakura D; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1480-6. PubMed ID: 16982305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interferences between mandibular proximal and distal segments in orthognathic surgery for patients with asymmetric mandibular prognathism depending on different osteotomy techniques.
Yang HJ; Lee WJ; Yi WJ; Hwang SJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 20382051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Mandibular function and dysfunction in patients with mandibular prognathism.
Wisth PJ
Am J Orthod; 1984 Mar; 85(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 6584030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Obwegeser II osteotomy (transoral angle osteotomy) for open bite with skeletal class III deformity.
Kwon TG; Na K; Lee SH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1382-8. PubMed ID: 24787080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Results in Good Long-Term Mandibular Stability in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism and Anterior Open Bite.
Choi SH; Cha JY; Park HS; Hwang CJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Apr; 74(4):804-10. PubMed ID: 26518527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparison of effect of the mandible setbacked by SSRO and IVRO on gnathostomatic system].
Yang X; Dong Y; Li Z
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 May; 35(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 11780218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Stability of Pre-Orthodontic Orthognathic Surgery Using Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Versus Conventional Treatment.
Choi SH; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Jung YS; Lee KJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 74(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 26259691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The effects of orthognathic surgery on mandibular movements in patients with mandibular prognathism].
Sinobad V; Dodić S; Strajnić L; Vukadinović M
Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2012; 140(11-12):704-10. PubMed ID: 23350242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
