These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9663764)

  • 1. A new technique for direct measurement of the shear force necessary to detach a cell from a material.
    Yamamoto A; Mishima S; Maruyama N; Sumita M
    Biomaterials; 1998; 19(7-9):871-9. PubMed ID: 9663764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative evaluation of cell attachment to glass, polystyrene, and fibronectin- or collagen-coated polystyrene by measurement of cell adhesive shear force and cell detachment energy.
    Yamamoto A; Mishima S; Maruyama N; Sumita M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 May; 50(2):114-24. PubMed ID: 10679674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the use of ultrasounds to quantify the longitudinal threshold force to detach osteoblastic cells from a conditioned glass substrate.
    Debavelaere-Callens D; Peyre L; Campistron P; Hildebrand HF
    Biomol Eng; 2007 Nov; 24(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 17904418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of fibroblast and bacterial detachment from biomaterials using jet impingement.
    Bundy KJ; Harris LG; Rahn BA; Richards RG
    Cell Biol Int; 2001; 25(4):289-307. PubMed ID: 11319836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantifying the adherence of fibroblasts to titanium and its enhancement by substrate-attached material.
    Derhami K; Wolfaardt JF; Wennerberg A; Scott PG
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Nov; 52(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 10951370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shear stress-dependent cell detachment from temperature-responsive cell culture surfaces in a microfluidic device.
    Tang Z; Akiyama Y; Itoga K; Kobayashi J; Yamato M; Okano T
    Biomaterials; 2012 Oct; 33(30):7405-11. PubMed ID: 22818649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of laser spallation as a technique for measurement of cell adhesion strength.
    Hagerman E; Shim J; Gupta V; Wu B
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Sep; 82(4):852-60. PubMed ID: 17335015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of substratum wettability on the strength of adhesion of human fibroblasts.
    van Kooten TG; Schakenraad JM; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ
    Biomaterials; 1992; 13(13):897-904. PubMed ID: 1477258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative method for determining the lateral strength of bacterial adhesion and application for characterizing adhesion kinetics.
    Deupree SM; Schoenfisch MH
    Langmuir; 2008 May; 24(9):4700-7. PubMed ID: 18399690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of the adhesion strength of fibroblast cells on ethylene glycol terminated self-assembled monolayers by a microfluidic shear force assay.
    Christophis C; Grunze M; Rosenhahn A
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2010 May; 12(17):4498-504. PubMed ID: 20407724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-dimensional manipulation of cardiac myocyte sheets utilizing temperature-responsive culture dishes augments the pulsatile amplitude.
    Shimizu T; Yamato M; Kikuchi A; Okano T
    Tissue Eng; 2001 Apr; 7(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 11304450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of cone and plate-type rheometer for quantitative analysis of endothelial cell detachment by shear stress.
    Furukawa KS; Ushida T; Noguchi T; Tamaki T; Tateishi T
    Int J Artif Organs; 2003 May; 26(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 12828311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vascular prostheses: performance related to cell-shear responses.
    Andrews KD; Feugier P; Black RA; Hunt JA
    J Surg Res; 2008 Sep; 149(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 18395748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of cell adhesion force by vertical forcible detachment using an arrowhead nanoneedle and atomic force microscopy.
    Ryu S; Hashizume Y; Mishima M; Kawamura R; Tamura M; Matsui H; Matsusaki M; Akashi M; Nakamura C
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2014 Aug; 451(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 25065738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The enhanced characteristics of osteoblast adhesion to photofunctionalized nanoscale TiO2 layers on biomaterials surfaces.
    Miyauchi T; Yamada M; Yamamoto A; Iwasa F; Suzawa T; Kamijo R; Baba K; Ogawa T
    Biomaterials; 2010 May; 31(14):3827-39. PubMed ID: 20153521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Visualizing living fibroblast on co-cultured denture base resin by green fluorescent protein marker introduced into the cell].
    Liu J; Wan L; Lu X; Li S; Zhang J; Cheng J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Jun; 21(3):355-8. PubMed ID: 15250132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frictional adhesion: A new angle on gecko attachment.
    Autumn K; Dittmore A; Santos D; Spenko M; Cutkosky M
    J Exp Biol; 2006 Sep; 209(Pt 18):3569-79. PubMed ID: 16943497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time-dependent adhesive interaction of osteoblastic cells with polished titanium alloyed implant surfaces.
    Fritsche A; Luethen F; Lembke U; Zietz C; Rychly J; Mittelmeier W; Bader R
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2013 Jun; 11(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 22798245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between 3T3 cell spreading and the strength of adhesion on glass and silane surfaces.
    Truskey GA; Proulx TL
    Biomaterials; 1993; 14(4):243-54. PubMed ID: 7682850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of seeding duration on the strength of chondrocyte adhesion to articular cartilage.
    Schinagl RM; Kurtis MS; Ellis KD; Chien S; Sah RL
    J Orthop Res; 1999 Jan; 17(1):121-9. PubMed ID: 10073656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.