214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9664280)
1. A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs.
Viceconti M; Bellingeri L; Cristofolini L; Toni A
Med Eng Phys; 1998 Jan; 20(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 9664280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison between automatically generated linear and parabolic tetrahedra when used to mesh a human femur.
Polgar K; Viceconti M; O'Connor JJ
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2001; 215(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 11323989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tetrahedral versus hexahedral finite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur.
Ramos A; Simões JA
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Nov; 28(9):916-24. PubMed ID: 16464628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating accurate FE models of the femur and pelvis.
Shim VB; Pitto RP; Streicher RM; Hunter PJ; Anderson IA
J Biomech; 2007; 40(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 16427645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new method for the automatic mesh generation of bone segments from CT data.
Viceconti M; Zannoni C; Testi D; Cappello A
J Med Eng Technol; 1999; 23(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 10356679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the generality and accuracy of a new mesh morphing procedure for the human femur.
Grassi L; Hraiech N; Schileo E; Ansaloni M; Rochette M; Viceconti M
Med Eng Phys; 2011 Jan; 33(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 21036655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image-based vs. mesh-based statistical appearance models of the human femur: implications for finite element simulations.
Bonaretti S; Seiler C; Boichon C; Reyes M; Büchler P
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Dec; 36(12):1626-35. PubMed ID: 25271191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic generation of accurate subject-specific bone finite element models to be used in clinical studies.
Viceconti M; Davinelli M; Taddei F; Cappello A
J Biomech; 2004 Oct; 37(10):1597-605. PubMed ID: 15336935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A voxel-based finite element model for the prediction of bladder deformation.
Chai X; van Herk M; Hulshof MC; Bel A
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 22225275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subject-specific finite element simulation of the human femur considering inhomogeneous material properties: a straightforward method and convergence study.
Hölzer A; Schröder C; Woiczinski M; Sadoghi P; Scharpf A; Heimkes B; Jansson V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Apr; 110(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 23084242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A universal algorithm for an improved finite element mesh generation Mesh quality assessment in comparison to former automated mesh-generators and an analytic model.
Kaminsky J; Rodt T; Gharabaghi A; Forster J; Brand G; Samii M
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jun; 27(5):383-94. PubMed ID: 15863347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study on different methods of automatic mesh generation of human femurs. Medical Engineering and Physics 20 (1998): 1-10.
Viceconti M
Med Eng Phys; 2000 Jun; 22(5):379-80. PubMed ID: 11186609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. High-quality mesh generation for human hip based on ideal element size: methods and evaluation.
Wang M; Gao J; Wang X
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2017 Dec; 22(sup1):212-220. PubMed ID: 29058486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The mesh-matching algorithm: an automatic 3D mesh generator for finite element structures.
Couteau B; Payan Y; Lavallée S
J Biomech; 2000 Aug; 33(8):1005-9. PubMed ID: 10828331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Use of voxel-oriented femur models for stress analysis. Generation, calculation and validation of CT-based FEM models].
Schmitt J; Lengsfeld M; Alter P; Leppek R
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1995 Jun; 40(6):175-81. PubMed ID: 7632871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Automatic generation of 3-D finite element codes of the human femur].
Lengsfeld M; Kaminsky J; Merz B; Franke RP
Biomed Tech (Berl); 1994 May; 39(5):117-22. PubMed ID: 8049341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated hexahedral mesh generation from biomedical image data: applications in limb prosthetics.
Zachariah SG; Sanders JE; Turkiyyah GM
IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1996 Jun; 4(2):91-102. PubMed ID: 8798076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A NURBS-based technique for subject-specific construction of knee bone geometry.
Au AG; Palathinkal D; Liggins AB; Raso VJ; Carey J; Lambert RG; Amirfazli A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Oct; 92(1):20-34. PubMed ID: 18644314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3-D femoral stress analysis using CT scans and p-version FEM.
Basu PK; Beall AG; Simmons DJ; Vannier M
Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1985-1986; 13(3-4):163-86. PubMed ID: 3841817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomical comparison and evaluation of human proximal femurs modeling via different devices and FEM analysis.
Verim Ö; Taşgetiren S; Er MS; Timur M; Yuran AF
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Jun; 9(2):e19-24. PubMed ID: 22711421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
