These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9665613)

  • 41. Reliability of categorical loudness scaling in the electrical domain.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; Stainsby T; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 53(6):409-17. PubMed ID: 24720542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 188(1-2):70-88. PubMed ID: 14759572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Loudness of simple and complex stimuli in electric hearing.
    Zeng FG; Shannon RV
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():235-8. PubMed ID: 7668651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Promontory electrical stimulation in postoperative acoustic tumor patients.
    Lambert PR; Ruth RA; Thomas JF
    Laryngoscope; 1992 Jul; 102(7):814-9. PubMed ID: 1614252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effects of stimulation mode on threshold and loudness growth in multielectrode cochlear implants.
    Chatterjee M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Feb; 105(2 Pt 1):850-60. PubMed ID: 9972570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Electrically induced potentiation of eighth nerve responses.
    Ball LL
    J Aud Res; 1982 Apr; 22(2):107-30. PubMed ID: 7187432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Amplitude modulation reduces loudness adaptation to high-frequency tones.
    Wynne DP; George SE; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):279-83. PubMed ID: 26233027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A test of the binaural equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis for tones.
    Marozeau J; Epstein M; Florentine M; Daley B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3870-7. PubMed ID: 17225414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Within-channel gap detection using dissimilar markers in cochlear implant listeners.
    Chatterjee M; Fu QJ; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2515-9. PubMed ID: 9604345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Optimal gain control step sizes for bimodal stimulation.
    Spirrov D; van Dijk B; Francart T
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):184-193. PubMed ID: 29172895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Oba S; Başkent D; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Interaural correlation and the binaural summation of loudness.
    Edmonds BA; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3865-70. PubMed ID: 19507969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Relationship between loudness growth function and auditory steady-state response in normal-hearing subjects.
    Ménard M; Gallégo S; Berger-Vachon C; Collet L; Thai-Van H
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):105-13. PubMed ID: 18093768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Phenomenon of rapid increase in loudness during residual masking of a tone with a tone].
    Shupliakov VS; Lesogor LV
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1986 Dec; 72(12):1630-4. PubMed ID: 3817205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Growth of pulsation threshold of a suppressed tone as a function of its level.
    Shannon RV; Houtgast T
    Hear Res; 1986; 21(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 3722004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Loudness and auditory steady-state responses in normal-hearing subjects.
    Zenker Castro F; Barajas de Prat JJ; Larumbe Zabala E
    Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):269-75. PubMed ID: 18465411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP; van Wieringen A; Deeks JM; Long CJ; Lyzenga J; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An effect of temporal asymmetry on loudness.
    Stecker GC; Hafter ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3358-68. PubMed ID: 10875381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.