These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9666928)

  • 1. The repeatability and variability of the multifocal electroretinogram for four different electrodes.
    Mohidin N; Yap MK; Jacobs RJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Nov; 17(6):530-5. PubMed ID: 9666928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of flash electroretinograms recorded from Burian Allen, JET, C-glide, gold foil, DTL and skin electrodes.
    Esakowitz L; Kriss A; Shawkat F
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():169-71. PubMed ID: 8325411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The characteristics of multifocal electroretinogram in normal subjects in China].
    Wu D; Liang J; Ma J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Mar; 37(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 11864400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of performance and patient satisfaction of two types of ERG electrodes.
    Beeler P; Barthelmes D; Sutter FK; Helbig H; Fleischhauer JC
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Apr; 224(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 17458789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The reproducibility of multifocal ERG recordings].
    Meigen T; Friedrich A
    Ophthalmologe; 2002 Sep; 99(9):713-8. PubMed ID: 12219261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrode comparison in pattern electroretinography.
    Prager TC; Saad N; Schweitzer FC; Garcia CA; Arden GB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Feb; 33(2):390-4. PubMed ID: 1740370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Multifocal ERG using ERG-jet and Gold Foil electrodes in normal subjects: comparison and reproducibility].
    Thimonier C; Daubas P; Bourdon L; Deral-Stephant V; Menu JP; Vignal R; Roux C
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Jun; 31(6 Pt 1):585-90. PubMed ID: 18772809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved electrode for electroretinography.
    Dawson WW; Trick GL; Litzkow CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1979 Sep; 18(9):988-91. PubMed ID: 478786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of a new fiber electrode prototype for clinical electroretinography.
    Berezovsky A; Pereira JM; Salomão SR; Santos VR; Schor P
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 18641814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel method to reduce noise in electroretinography using skin electrodes: a study of noise level, inter-session variability, and reproducibility.
    Yamashita T; Miki A; Tabuchi A; Funada H; Kondo M
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 37(2):317-324. PubMed ID: 27278187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing.
    Yin H; Pardue MT
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2004 Jan; 108(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15104170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recording the contralateral PERG: effect of different electrodes.
    Peachey NS; Sokol S; Moskowitz A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1983 Nov; 24(11):1514-6. PubMed ID: 6642930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The gold foil electrode in pattern electroretinography.
    Prager TC; Fea AM; Sponsel WE; Schweitzer FC; McNulty L; Garcia CA
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1994; 86(3):267-74. PubMed ID: 7813378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new DTL-electrode holder for recording of electroretinograms in animals.
    Schatz A; Willmann G; Enderle H; Sliesoraityte I; Messias A; Bartz-Schmidt KU; Zrenner E; Gekeler F
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Feb; 195(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 21075141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A contact lens electrode with built-in high intensity white light-emitting diodes. A contact lens electrode with built-in white LEDs.
    Kondo M; Piao CH; Tanikawa A; Horiguchi M; Miyake Y
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2001 Jan; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 11475361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amplitude increase of the multifocal electroretinogram during light adaptation.
    Kondo M; Miyake Y; Piao CH; Tanikawa A; Horiguchi M; Terasaki H
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Oct; 40(11):2633-7. PubMed ID: 10509660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amplitude scaling relationships of Burian-Allen, gold foil and Dawson, Trick and Litzkow electrodes.
    Hennessy MP; Vaegan
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1995; 89(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 7555591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo electrical stimulation of rabbit retina with a microfabricated array: strategies to maximize responses for prospective assessment of stimulus efficacy and biocompatibility.
    Rizzo JF; Goldbaum S; Shahin M; Denison TJ; Wyatt J
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2004; 22(6):429-43. PubMed ID: 15798362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparisons of contact lens, foil, fiber and skin electrodes for patterns electroretinograms.
    McCulloch DL; Van Boemel GB; Borchert MS
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1997-1998; 94(4):327-40. PubMed ID: 9858093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability of the multifocal electroretinogram based on the type and position of the electrode.
    García-García Á; Muñoz-Negrete FJ; Rebolleda G
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 133(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 27665467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.