334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9667429)
41. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Effect of infrasound on cochlear damage from exposure to a 4 kHz octave band of noise.
Harding GW; Bohne BA; Lee SC; Salt AN
Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):128-38. PubMed ID: 17300889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Detection and differentiation of sensorineural hearing loss in mice using auditory steady-state responses and transient auditory brainstem responses.
Pauli-Magnus D; Hoch G; Strenzke N; Anderson S; Jentsch TJ; Moser T
Neuroscience; 2007 Nov; 149(3):673-84. PubMed ID: 17869440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Age-related changes in transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing ears.
Satoh Y; Kanzaki J; O-Uchi T; Yoshihara S
Auris Nasus Larynx; 1998 May; 25(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 9673723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of TEOAE and DPOAE measurements for the assessment of auditory thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss.
Suckfüll M; Schneeweiss S; Dreher A; Schorn K
Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Jul; 116(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 8831837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Sex differences in distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a function of age in CBA mice.
Guimaraes P; Zhu X; Cannon T; Kim S; Frisina RD
Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):83-9. PubMed ID: 15157966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA; Hoover BM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3275-84. PubMed ID: 12822800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. An objective method of analyzing cochlear versus noncochlear patterns of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in patients with acoustic neuromas.
Telischi F
Laryngoscope; 2000 Apr; 110(4):553-62. PubMed ID: 10763999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Alternative distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing loss in a clinical population.
Lind O
Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 10572971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions for hearing threshold estimation and differentiation between middle-ear and cochlear disorders in neonates.
Janssen T; Gehr DD; Klein A; Müller J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):2969-79. PubMed ID: 15957767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Myosin light chain kinase regulates hearing in mice by influencing the F-actin cytoskeleton of outer hair cells and cochleae.
Yang X; Wang JG; Ma DB; Ma XF; Zhu GJ; Zhou H; Yu CJ; Qian XY; Gao X
Int J Mol Med; 2014 Apr; 33(4):905-12. PubMed ID: 24481113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Observations of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Components in Adults With Hearing Loss.
Prieve BA; Thomas L; Long G; Talmadge C
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):652-662. PubMed ID: 31569117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Diagnostics of the cochlear amplifier by means of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Janssen T; Niedermeyer HP; Arnold W
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2006; 68(6):334-9. PubMed ID: 17065826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Clinical relevance of distortion product emissions by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Steinhart HU; Bohlender JE; Benttzien S; Hoppe U
Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(3):131-40. PubMed ID: 11683451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dierking DM; Dorn PA; Hoover BM; Fitzpatrick DF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):263-78. PubMed ID: 12880040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Characteristic findings of auditory brainstem response and otoacoustic emission in the Bronx waltzer mouse.
Inagaki M; Kon K; Suzuki S; Kobayashi N; Kaga M; Nanba E
Brain Dev; 2006 Nov; 28(10):617-24. PubMed ID: 16730938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of distortion-product and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with ABR threshold shift in chinchillas with ototoxic damage.
Kakigi A; Hirakawa H; Harel N; Mount RJ; Harrison RV
Auris Nasus Larynx; 1998 Sep; 25(3):223-32. PubMed ID: 9799987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Auditory neuropathy characteristics in children with cochlear nerve deficiency.
Buchman CA; Roush PA; Teagle HF; Brown CJ; Zdanski CJ; Grose JH
Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 16825889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
Moulin A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
