These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9667430)

  • 21. Morphological and functional preservation of the outer hair cells from noise trauma by sound conditioning.
    Canlon B; Fransson A
    Hear Res; 1995 Apr; 84(1-2):112-24. PubMed ID: 7642444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hybrid measurement of auditory steady-state responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions using an amplitude-modulated primary tone.
    Oswald JA; Rosner T; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3886-95. PubMed ID: 16838532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrophysiologic Characteristics of Various Degrees of Selective Outer Hair Cell Loss in Rats.
    Huang W; Chen S; Dong C; Li C; Sun L; Wang X; Jiang H
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Oct; 40(9):1246-1252. PubMed ID: 31469797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of distortion-product and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions with ABR threshold shift in chinchillas with ototoxic damage.
    Kakigi A; Hirakawa H; Harel N; Mount RJ; Harrison RV
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1998 Sep; 25(3):223-32. PubMed ID: 9799987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sex differences in distortion product otoacoustic emissions as a function of age in CBA mice.
    Guimaraes P; Zhu X; Cannon T; Kim S; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):83-9. PubMed ID: 15157966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS; Prieve BA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. DPOAE in estimation of the function of the cochlea in tinnitus patients with normal hearing.
    Sztuka A; Pospiech L; Gawron W; Dudek K
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2010 Feb; 37(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 19560298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interpreting auditory brainstem evoked responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in diabetic patients with normal hearing.
    Cho WK; Kang WS; Lee JB; Park HJ; Chung JW; Ahn JH
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2021 Apr; 48(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 32921527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating cochlear filter response properties from distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) phase delay measurements in normal hearing human adults.
    Bowman DM; Eggermont JJ; Brown DK; Kimberley BP
    Hear Res; 1998 May; 119(1-2):14-26. PubMed ID: 9641315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Further efforts to predict pure-tone thresholds from distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions.
    Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dorn PA; Hoover BM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jun; 113(6):3275-84. PubMed ID: 12822800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cochlear Mechanisms and Otoacoustic Emission Test Performance.
    Go NA; Stamper GC; Johnson TA
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):401-417. PubMed ID: 29952805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measurement of conductive hearing loss in mice.
    Qin Z; Wood M; Rosowski JJ
    Hear Res; 2010 May; 263(1-2):93-103. PubMed ID: 19835942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evidence for the distortion product frequency place as a source of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure in humans. II. Fine structure for different shapes of cochlear hearing loss.
    Mauermann M; Uppenkamp S; van Hengel PW; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3484-91. PubMed ID: 10615688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Antioxidant treatment reduces blast-induced cochlear damage and hearing loss.
    Ewert DL; Lu J; Li W; Du X; Floyd R; Kopke R
    Hear Res; 2012 Mar; 285(1-2):29-39. PubMed ID: 22326291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Transitory evoked and distortion products of otoacoustic emissions in absent auditory evoked potentials].
    Schöler C; Schönweiler R; Ptok M
    HNO; 1997 Dec; 45(12):1008-15. PubMed ID: 9486382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test performance when both 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 are used to predict auditory status.
    Gorga MP; Nelson K; Davis T; Dorn PA; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2128-35. PubMed ID: 10790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.