119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9668708)
1. Can decision analysis help us decide whether ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies is worth it?
Romano PS; Waitzman NJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Jun; 847():154-72. PubMed ID: 9668708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Antenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: a systematic review of studies of cost and cost effectiveness.
Roberts T; Henderson J; Mugford M; Bricker L; Neilson J; Garcia J
BJOG; 2002 Jan; 109(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 11843373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduced costs of congenital anomalies from fetal ultrasound: are they sufficient to justify routine screening in the United States?
Waitzman NJ; Romano PS
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Jun; 847():141-53. PubMed ID: 9668707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Managed care and ultrasound for the diagnosis of fetal anomalies.
Buechler EJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Jun; 847():181-4. PubMed ID: 9668710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost Analysis of Following Up Incomplete Low-Risk Fetal Anatomy Ultrasounds.
O'Brien K; Shainker SA; Modest AM; Spiel MH; Resetkova N; Shah N; Hacker MR
Birth; 2017 Mar; 44(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 27862256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical dimensions of ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies.
Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Jun; 847():185-90. PubMed ID: 9668711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal anomalies in a controlled one-stage ultrasound screening trial. A report from the Helsinki Ultrasound Trial.
Saari-Kemppainen A; Karjalainen O; Ylöstalo P; Heinonen OP
J Perinat Med; 1994; 22(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 7877064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Choosing options for ultrasound screening in pregnancy and comparing cost effectiveness: a decision analysis approach.
Roberts T; Mugford M; Piercy J
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Sep; 105(9):960-70. PubMed ID: 9763046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Routine ultrasound screening of congenital anomalies. An overview of the European experience.
Levi S
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Jun; 847():86-98. PubMed ID: 9668701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity of fetal anomaly detection as a function of time.
Dervaux B; Leleu H; Lebrun T; Levi S; Grandjean H
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Jun; 847():125-35. PubMed ID: 9668705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance.
Karim JN; Roberts NW; Salomon LJ; Papageorghiou AT
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):429-441. PubMed ID: 27546497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound.
Rouse DJ; Owen J; Goldenberg RL; Cliver SP
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(18):1480-6. PubMed ID: 8903259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Performance of First-Trimester Anatomy Scan: A Decision Analysis.
Harper LM; Wood SL; Jenkins SM; Owen J; Biggio JR
Am J Perinatol; 2016 Aug; 33(10):957-65. PubMed ID: 27105290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eurofetus: an evaluation of routine ultrasound screening for the detection of fetal defects. Aims and method.
Levi S; Montenegro NA
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1998 Jun; 847():103-17. PubMed ID: 9668703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First trimester anomaly scan using virtual reality (VR FETUS study): study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.
Pietersma CS; Mulders AGMGJ; Moolenaar LM; Hunink MGM; Koning AHJ; Willemsen SP; Go ATJI; Steegers EAP; Rousian M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Sep; 20(1):515. PubMed ID: 32894073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.
Chitayat D; Langlois S; Douglas Wilson R; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2011 Jul; 33(7):736-750. PubMed ID: 21749752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound Study: another perspective.
DeVore GR
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):622-6. PubMed ID: 8090403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal abnormalities: 22 years' experience.
Carrera JM; Torrents M; Mortera C; Cusí V; Muñoz A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Mar; 5(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 7788491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 2: are we ready to screen for fetal anomalies with first trimester ultrasound?
Kontopoulos E; Odibo A; Wilson RD
Prenat Diagn; 2013 Jan; 33(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 23296714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of routine ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of structural anomalies of the fetus.
Ashe RG; Dornan JC; Patterson CC; Thompson W
Ir Med J; 1996; 89(5):180-2. PubMed ID: 8936842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
