These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9669138)

  • 1. Applications of bone densitometry for osteoporosis.
    Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am; 1998 Jun; 27(2):267-88. PubMed ID: 9669138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone densitometry: current status and future prospects.
    Blake GM; Glüer CC; Fogelman I
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70 Spec No():S177-86. PubMed ID: 9534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
    Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
    Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
    Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R
    Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone mineral density evaluation in osteoporosis: why yes and why not?
    Celi M; Rao C; Scialdoni A; Tempesta V; Gasbarra E; Pistillo P; Tarantino U
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2013 Oct; 25 Suppl 1():S47-9. PubMed ID: 24046042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
    Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How can we measure bone quality?
    Hans D; Fuerst T; Lang T; Majumdar S; Lu Y; Genant HK; Glüer C
    Baillieres Clin Rheumatol; 1997 Aug; 11(3):495-515. PubMed ID: 9367034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discriminative ability of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in men with hip or distal forearm fractures.
    Cesme F; Esmaeilzadeh S; Oral A
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016 Oct; 50(5):548-553. PubMed ID: 27680751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The clinical role of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):406-14. PubMed ID: 19647962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.
    Blake GM; Fogelman I
    J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 17289532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men.
    Gonnelli S; Cepollaro C; Gennari L; Montagnani A; Caffarelli C; Merlotti D; Rossi S; Cadirni A; Nuti R
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Aug; 16(8):963-8. PubMed ID: 15599495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative ultrasound and bone health.
    Knapp KM
    Salud Publica Mex; 2009; 51 Suppl 1():S18-24. PubMed ID: 19287888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of DXA bone density scans in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis.
    Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Postgrad Med J; 2007 Aug; 83(982):509-17. PubMed ID: 17675543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The discriminative ability of peripheral and axial bone measurements to identify proximal femoral, vertebral, distal forearm and proximal humeral fractures: a case control study.
    Clowes JA; Eastell R; Peel NF
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1794-802. PubMed ID: 15947861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The usefulness of dual energy X-ray and laser absorptiometry of the calcaneus versus dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of hip and spine in diagnosing manifest osteoporosis.
    de Klerk G; van der Velde D; van der Palen J; van Bergeijk L; Hegeman JH
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Feb; 129(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18825395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the longitudinal changes in quantitative ultrasound with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the four-year effects of hormone replacement therapy.
    Sahota O; San P; Cawte SA; Pearson D; Hosking DJ
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 10663359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?
    Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peripheral bone densitometry: Clinical applications.
    Eis SR; Lewiecki EM
    Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol; 2006 Aug; 50(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 17117285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An update on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Semin Nucl Med; 2010 Jan; 40(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 19958851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?
    Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.