497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9669178)
1. Setting priorities for science support.
Dresser R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(3):21-3. PubMed ID: 9669178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. New president, new congress..... new hope for science?
Wolinetz CD
Physiologist; 2009 Feb; 52(1):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 19271423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. As AIDS money is parceled out, political questions.
Pear R
N Y Times Web; 1993 Feb; ():E3. PubMed ID: 11646983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. AIDS and drug pricing: in search of a policy.
Salbu SR
Wash Univ Law Q; 1993; 71(3):691-734. PubMed ID: 11652750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. science policy. NIH stimulus plan triggers flood of applications--and anxiety.
Kaiser J
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5925):318-9. PubMed ID: 19372395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Responding to stimuli.
Mahapatra A
ACS Chem Biol; 2009 Apr; 4(4):233. PubMed ID: 19371128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. National Cancer Act: a look back and forward.
Vanchieri C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 17341721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bioethical catch-22: the moratorium on federal funding of fetal tissue transplantation research and the NIH revitalization amendments.
Maroney HM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():485-519. PubMed ID: 10126947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomedical politics. Sex studies denounced, NIH's peer-review process defended.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5647):966-7. PubMed ID: 14605337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Strength through diversity.
Nature; 2004 Dec; 432(7019):785. PubMed ID: 15602507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stanton Glantz on snuffing tobacco research. Interview by Thomasine Kushner.
Glantz S
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1996; 5(3):415-21. PubMed ID: 8862828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Science by quota: P.C. medicine.
Satel SL
New Repub; 1995 Feb; 212(9):14, 16. PubMed ID: 11655245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. High stakes for US science.
Tollefson J; Ledford H
Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7421):453-5. PubMed ID: 23099376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Federal funding of human embryonic stem cell research: an institutional examination.
Fujikawa R
South Calif Law Rev; 2005 May; 78(4):1075-124. PubMed ID: 17340756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
Dove A
Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. U.S. science policy. Meet two new science spending cardinals in Congress.
Mervis J
Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6221):466-7. PubMed ID: 25635067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of NIH funds placed under a spotlight.
Marris E
Nature; 2005 Sep; 437(7059):601. PubMed ID: 16193003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. House approves NIH funding, "de-funds" two NIMH grants.
Physiologist; 2004 Oct; 47(5):382. PubMed ID: 15587608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The folly of the human genome project.
Rechsteiner M
New Sci; 1990 Sep; 127(1734):20. PubMed ID: 11659262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
