These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9670188)

  • 21. Improved efficacy of anodal biphasic defibrillation shocks following a failed defibrillation attempt.
    Roberts PR; Allen S; Smith DC; Urban JF; Euler DE; Kallok MJ; Morgan JM
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1753-9. PubMed ID: 10642128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.
    Exner D; Yee R; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Mehra R
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of waveform and polarity on defibrillation thresholds in humans using a transvenous lead system.
    Shorofsky SR; Gold MR
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Aug; 78(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 8759811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lead system optimization for transvenous defibrillation.
    Gold MR; Foster AH; Shorofsky SR
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(9):1163-7. PubMed ID: 9359543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Truncated biphasic pulses for transthoracic defibrillation.
    Bardy GH; Gliner BE; Kudenchuk PJ; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Jones GK; Anderson J; Troutman C; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1995 Mar; 91(6):1768-74. PubMed ID: 7882486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
    Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of phase separation on biphasic waveform defibrillation.
    Cooper RA; Wallenius ST; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Mar; 16(3 Pt 1):471-82. PubMed ID: 7681199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic truncated exponential shocks for nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation in dogs.
    Chapman PD; Vetter JW; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN; Hoffmann RG
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 12(3):739-45. PubMed ID: 3403834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Novel rectangular biphasic and monophasic waveforms delivered by a radiofrequency-powered defibrillator compared with conventional capacitor-based waveforms in transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
    Walsh SJ; Manoharan G; Escalona OJ; Santos J; Evans N; Anderson JM; Stevenson M; Allen JD; Adgey AA
    Europace; 2006 Oct; 8(10):873-80. PubMed ID: 17000635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of biphasic waveform pulse on endocardial defibrillation efficacy in humans.
    Neuzner J; Pitschner HF; Huth C; Schlepper M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Feb; 17(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 7513406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A prospective randomized comparison in humans of biphasic waveform 60-microF and 120-microF capacitance pulses using a unipolar defibrillation system.
    Bardy GH; Poole JE; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Raitt MH; Jones GK; Johnson G
    Circulation; 1995 Jan; 91(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 7805224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Defibrillation electrode configurations developed from cardiac mapping that combine biphasic shocks with sequential timing.
    Guse PA; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Am Heart J; 1992 Dec; 124(6):1491-500. PubMed ID: 1462904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Importance of electrode design, lead configuration and impedance for successful low energy transcatheter atrial defibrillation in dogs.
    Kalman JM; Power JM; Chen JM; Farish SJ; Tonkin AM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 22(4):1199-206. PubMed ID: 8409061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prospective randomized comparison of biphasic waveform tilt using a unipolar defibrillation system.
    Poole JE; Bardy GH; Kudenchuk PJ; Dolack GL; Raitt MH; Mehra R; Johnson G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jul; 18(7):1369-73. PubMed ID: 7567589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimized pulse durations minimize the effect of polarity reversal on defibrillation efficacy with biphasic shocks.
    Irnich W
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1851-2. PubMed ID: 10642148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of a single element subcutaneous array electrode added to a transvenous electrode configuration on the defibrillation field and the defibrillation threshold.
    Kühlkamp V; Dörnberger V; Khalighi K; Mewis C; Suchalla R; Ziemer G; Seipel L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Dec; 21(12):2596-605. PubMed ID: 9894650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical efficacy of shock waveforms and lead configurations for defibrillation.
    Jung W; Manz M; Moosdorf R; Spehl S; Wolpert C; Korte T; Lüderitz B
    Am Heart J; 1994 Apr; 127(4 Pt 2):985-93. PubMed ID: 8160603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of defibrillation efficacy between different impedance compensation techniques in high impedance porcine model.
    Li Y; Ristagno G; Yu T; Bisera J; Weil MH; Tang W
    Resuscitation; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1312-7. PubMed ID: 19720442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prospective randomized comparison of anodal monophasic shocks versus biphasic cathodal shocks on defibrillation energy requirements.
    Strickberger SA; Daoud E; Goyal R; Chan KK; Bogun F; Castellani M; Harvey M; Horwood LE; Niebauer M; Man KC; Morady F
    Am Heart J; 1996 May; 131(5):961-5. PubMed ID: 8615317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Randomized comparison of a 90 uF capacitor three-electrode defibrillation system with a 125 uF two-electrode defibrillation system.
    Bahu M; Knight BP; Weiss R; Hahn SJ; Goyal R; Daoud EG; Man KC; Morady F; Strickberger SA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1998 Mar; 2(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 9869995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.