BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9670528)

  • 1. Otoacoustic emissions measured with a physically open recording system.
    Withnell RH; Kirk DL; Yates GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):350-5. PubMed ID: 9670528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrically evoked cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL; Miller JM
    Hear Res; 1996 Dec; 102(1-2):43-50. PubMed ID: 8951449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions from apical and basal perilymphatic electrode positions in the guinea pig cochlea.
    Nuttall AL; Zheng J; Ren T; de Boer E
    Hear Res; 2001 Feb; 152(1-2):77-89. PubMed ID: 11223283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Yates GK; Withnell RH
    Hear Res; 1999 Oct; 136(1-2):49-64. PubMed ID: 10511624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term stability between click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs: A comparison.
    Hoshino M; Ueda H; Nakata S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 10450050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions and their distortion products in guinea pigs].
    Guo M; Wang J
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Mar; 16(1):63-6, 70. PubMed ID: 12553279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing otoacoustic emissions evoked by chirp transients with constant absorbed sound power and constant incident pressure magnitude.
    Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):499. PubMed ID: 28147608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustical modulation of electrically evoked otoacoustic emission in intact gerbil cochlea.
    Ren T; Nuttall AL
    Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 120(1-2):7-16. PubMed ID: 9667426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192930. PubMed ID: 29451905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions measured using an open ear-canal recording technique.
    Boul A; Lineton B
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):112-21. PubMed ID: 20600736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Contralateral suppression of latency during distortion product otoacoustic emissions detection in guinea pigs].
    Kong W; Yang Y; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Aug; 36(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 12761994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Basilar membrane vibration is not involved in the reverse propagation of otoacoustic emissions.
    He W; Ren T
    Sci Rep; 2013; 3():1874. PubMed ID: 23695199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency tuning and acoustic enhancement of electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig cochlea.
    Kirk DL; Yates GK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3714-25. PubMed ID: 8969473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of salicylate on electrically evoked otoacoustic emissions elicited in the first and third turns of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Fujimura K; Yoshida M; Goto K; Mori T; Suzuki H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Oct; 124(8):896-901. PubMed ID: 15513523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Otoacoustic distortion products in adults with normal hearing].
    Simoncelli C; Molini E; Ricci G; Capolunghi B; Alunni N
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1995 Apr; 15(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 8928654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus ratio dependence of low-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Christensen AT; Ordoñez R; Hammershøi D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):679-89. PubMed ID: 25698003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pig: basic characteristics.
    Avan P; Loth D; Menguy C; Teyssou M
    Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 44(2-3):151-60. PubMed ID: 2329091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured with amplitude-modulated suppressor tones (L).
    Neely ST; Johnson TA; Garner CA; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Oct; 118(4):2124-7. PubMed ID: 16266132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Use of acoustic distortion products in clinical diagnosis. The site of origin of otoacoustic emissions in the inner ear].
    Plinkert PK; Harris FP; Probst R
    HNO; 1993 Jul; 41(7):339-44. PubMed ID: 8376180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reverse middle-ear transfer function in the guinea pig measured with cubic difference tones.
    Magnan P; Avan P; Dancer A; Smurzynski J; Probst R
    Hear Res; 1997 May; 107(1-2):41-5. PubMed ID: 9165345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.