103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9670536)
1. Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant subjects.
Richardson LM; Busby PA; Clark GM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jul; 104(1):442-52. PubMed ID: 9670536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant listeners under forward masking conditions.
Chatterjee M; Kulkarni AM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):1117. PubMed ID: 29495705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners.
Chatterjee M; Oba SI
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Dec; 5(4):360-75. PubMed ID: 15675001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.
Dingemanse JG; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):645-57. PubMed ID: 17086076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modulation masking in cochlear implant listeners: envelope versus tonotopic components.
Chatterjee M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2042-53. PubMed ID: 12703715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition.
Zhou N
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165476. PubMed ID: 27798658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearing.
Nelson DA; Donaldson GS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2921-33. PubMed ID: 11425134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of masker gating for signal detection in unmodulated and modulated bandlimited noise.
Hall JW; Grose JH; Hatch DR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2365-72. PubMed ID: 8865643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting thresholds for sinusoidal signals in narrow-band maskers with fluctuating envelopes.
Moore BC; Glasberg BR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 3624643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Goehring JL; Baudhuin JL; Schmid KK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2297. PubMed ID: 27794318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of modulator phase for comodulation masking release and modulation detection interference.
Richards VM; Buss E; Tian L
J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jul; 102(1):468-76. PubMed ID: 9228809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The perception of temporal modulations by cochlear implant patients.
Busby PA; Tong YC; Clark GM
J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jul; 94(1):124-31. PubMed ID: 8354754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modulation discrimination interference and comodulation masking release as a function of the number and spectral placement of narrow-band noise modulators.
Moore BC; Jorasz U
J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2373-81. PubMed ID: 8865644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.
Galvin JJ; Oba S; Başkent D; Fu QJ
Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
De Ruiter AM; Debruyne JA; Chenault MN; Francart T; Brokx JP
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Some effects of background noise on modulation detection interference.
Bacon SP
Hear Res; 1999 Mar; 129(1-2):20-6. PubMed ID: 10190748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
