These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9670540)

  • 61. Some effects of duration on vowel recognition.
    Hillenbrand JM; Clark MJ; Houde RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Dec; 108(6):3013-22. PubMed ID: 11144593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Production of Vowels by Electrolaryngeal Speakers Using Clear Speech.
    Cox SR; Raphael LJ; Doyle PC
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2020; 72(4):250-256. PubMed ID: 31121594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Vowel identification by younger and older listeners: relative effectiveness of vowel edges and vowel centers.
    Donaldson GS; Talmage EK; Rogers CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):EL105-10. PubMed ID: 20815425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The Use of Static and Dynamic Cues for Vowel Identification by Children Wearing Hearing Aids or Cochlear Implants.
    Hedrick M; Thornton KET; Yeager K; Plyler P; Johnstone P; Reilly K; Springer C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 30998549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception.
    Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2088-113. PubMed ID: 2659638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels.
    Hillenbrand J; Getty LA; Clark MJ; Wheeler K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 May; 97(5 Pt 1):3099-111. PubMed ID: 7759650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. How children learn to organize their speech gestures: further evidence from fricative-vowel syllables.
    Nittrouer S; Studdert-Kennedy M; Neely ST
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Apr; 39(2):379-89. PubMed ID: 8729924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The acoustic vowel space of modern Greek and German.
    Jongman A; Fourakis M; Sereno JA
    Lang Speech; 1989; 32 ( Pt 3)():221-48. PubMed ID: 2640475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary.
    Whalen DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):275-82. PubMed ID: 7217525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Acoustic and perceptual correlates of the non-nasal--nasal distinction for vowels.
    Hawkins S; Stevens KN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1560-75. PubMed ID: 3989111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Distance vs time. Acoustic and articulatory consequences of reduced vowel duration in Polish.
    Strycharczuk P; Ćavar M; Coretta S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jul; 150(1):592. PubMed ID: 34340503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The relationship between native allophonic experience with vowel duration and perception of the English tense/lax vowel contrast by Spanish and Russian listeners.
    Kondaurova MV; Francis AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3959. PubMed ID: 19206820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Acoustic and perceptual similarity of Japanese and American English vowels.
    Nishi K; Strange W; Akahane-Yamada R; Kubo R; Trent-Brown SA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jul; 124(1):576-88. PubMed ID: 18647000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3454-67. PubMed ID: 8326071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Acoustic phonetic study of the Sora vowel system.
    Horo L; Sarmah P; Anderson GDS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):3000. PubMed ID: 32359268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. A developmental study of vowel perception from brief synthetic consonant-vowel syllables.
    Ohde RN; Haley KL; McMahon CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3813-24. PubMed ID: 8969482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English.
    Fourakis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1816-27. PubMed ID: 1960277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Intrinsic F0 in tense and lax vowels with special reference to German.
    Fischer-Jørgensen E
    Phonetica; 1990; 47(3-4):99-140. PubMed ID: 2130383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The acoustic effects of vowel equalization training in singers.
    Dromey C; Heaton E; Hopkin JA
    J Voice; 2011 Nov; 25(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 21216128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Acoustic vowel reduction in Creek: effects of distinctive length and position in the word.
    Johnson K; Martin J
    Phonetica; 2001; 58(1-2):81-102. PubMed ID: 11096370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.