These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9670595)

  • 1. Optimal selection of sib pairs from random samples for linkage analysis of a QTL using the EDAC test.
    Dolan CV; Boomsma DI
    Behav Genet; 1998 May; 28(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 9670595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The power to detect linkage disequilibrium with quantitative traits in selected samples.
    Abecasis GR; Cookson WO; Cardon LR
    Am J Hum Genet; 2001 Jun; 68(6):1463-74. PubMed ID: 11349228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection and subsequent analysis of sib pair data for QTL detection.
    Chatziplis DG; Hamann H; Haley CS
    Genet Res; 2001 Oct; 78(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 11732095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anxiety and depression in twin and sib pairs extremely discordant and concordant for neuroticism: prodromus to a linkage study.
    Kirk KM; Birley AJ; Statham DJ; Haddon B; Lake RI; Andrews JG; Martin NG
    Twin Res; 2000 Dec; 3(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 11463151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using multivariate genetic modeling to detect pleiotropic quantitative trait loci.
    Boomsma DI
    Behav Genet; 1996 Mar; 26(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 8639151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power analysis of QTL detection in half-sib families using selective DNA pooling.
    Baro JA ; Carleos C; Corral N; López T; Cañón J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2001; 33(3):231-47. PubMed ID: 11403746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extreme discordant sib pairs for mapping quantitative trait loci in humans.
    Risch N; Zhang H
    Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5217):1584-9. PubMed ID: 7777857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Removing the sampling restrictions from family-based tests of association for a quantitative-trait locus.
    Monks SA; Kaplan NL
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 Feb; 66(2):576-92. PubMed ID: 10677318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power of concordant versus discordant sib pairs at different penetrance levels.
    Nicolaou M; Premkumar S; DeStefano AL; Farrer LA; Cupples LA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S679-84. PubMed ID: 10597513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A unified sampling approach for multipoint analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits in sib pairs.
    Liang KY; Huang CY; Beaty TH
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1631-41. PubMed ID: 10762548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Power and sample sizes for linkage with extreme sampling under an oligogenic model for quantitative traits.
    Heo M; Faith MS; Allison DB
    Behav Genet; 2002 Jan; 32(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 11958540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simulation study of the effects of assignment of prior identity-by-descent probabilities to unselected sib pairs, in covariance-structure modeling of a quantitative-trait locus.
    Dolan CV; Boomsma DI; Neale MC
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Jan; 64(1):268-80. PubMed ID: 9915966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simulation study concerning the effect of varying the residual phenotypic correlation on the power of bivariate quantitative trait loci linkage analysis.
    Evans DM; Duffy DL
    Behav Genet; 2004 Mar; 34(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 14755178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal selection on two quantitative trait loci with linkage.
    Dekkers JC; Chakraborty R; Moreau L
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(2):171-92. PubMed ID: 12081806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Composite statistics for QTL mapping with moderately discordant sibling pairs.
    Forrest WF; Feingold E
    Am J Hum Genet; 2000 May; 66(5):1642-60. PubMed ID: 10762549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A weighted test using both extreme discordant and concordant sib pairs for detecting linkage.
    Li Z; Gastwirth JL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 11119295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power of regression and maximum likelihood methods to map QTL from sib-pair and DZ twin data.
    Visscher PM; Hopper JL
    Ann Hum Genet; 2001 Nov; 65(Pt 6):583-601. PubMed ID: 11851988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Power of variance component linkage analysis to detect quantitative trait loci.
    Williams JT; Blangero J
    Ann Hum Genet; 1999 Nov; 63(Pt 6):545-63. PubMed ID: 11246457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. QTL mapping with discordant and concordant sibling pairs: new statistics and new design strategies.
    Szatkiewicz JP; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005 May; 28(4):326-40. PubMed ID: 15662636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.