112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9672569)
1. The uses and misuses of skepticism: epidemiology and its critics.
Ozonoff D
Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(4):321-3. PubMed ID: 9672569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. EPA considering raising chloroform goals for drinking water.
Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(4):290. PubMed ID: 9672557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Public health. Arsenic epidemiology and drinking water standards.
Smith AH; Lopipero PA; Bates MN; Steinmaus CM
Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5576):2145-6. PubMed ID: 12077388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental health. Second look at arsenic finds higher risk.
Kaiser J
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2189. PubMed ID: 11567118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Chlorine industry says EPA rules ignore good science.
Reichhardt T
Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6738):718. PubMed ID: 10391226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Incorporating biologically based models into assessments of risk from chemical contaminants.
Bull RJ; Conolly RB; De Marini DM; MacPhail RC; Ohanian EV; Swenberg JA
J Am Water Works Assoc; 1993 Mar; 85(3):49-52. PubMed ID: 11538064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is ionizing radiation regulated more stringently than chemical carcinogens?
Travis CC; Pack SR; Hattemer-Frey HA
Health Phys; 1989 Apr; 56(4):527-31. PubMed ID: 2925392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Arsenic--an old story with big stakes.
Schnoor JL
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Feb; 45(3):837. PubMed ID: 21275371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Environmental health. Debate continues over safety of water spiked with rocket fuel.
Stokstad E
Science; 2005 Jan; 307(5709):507. PubMed ID: 15681361
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Plans to reduce acceptable arsenic limit put on hold.
Lok C
Nature; 2001 Mar; 410(6828):503. PubMed ID: 11279452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pesticides in drinking water: what should be the standard?
Harrison WN; Watt BE; Vale JA
J Toxicol Clin Toxicol; 2000; 38(2):145-7. PubMed ID: 10778911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The risk assessment of cancer morbidity in the joint action of carcinogens].
Shaĭkina OI; Shaĭkin AB; Kon'shina LG
Gig Sanit; 1999; (1):41-3. PubMed ID: 10199078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental health. Academy to mediate debate over rocket-fuel contaminants.
Renner R
Science; 2003 Mar; 299(5614):1829. PubMed ID: 12649455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cancer risk assessment: importance of identifying mechanisms of action.
Bull RJ
J Am Water Works Assoc; 1990 Oct; 82(10):57-60. PubMed ID: 11538297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beverages: bottled water. Final rule.
Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Fed Regist; 2005 Jun; 70(110):33694-701. PubMed ID: 15945150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Browner slams GE's Hudson PCB campaign.
Hoyle R
Nat Biotechnol; 1998 Aug; 16(8):700. PubMed ID: 9702754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Drawing the battle lines: tracing the "Science War" in the construction of the chloroform and human health risks debate.
Driedger SM; Eyles J
Environ Manage; 2003 Apr; 31(4):476-88. PubMed ID: 12677294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regulating mercury: what's at stake?
Gayer T; Hahn RW
Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5732):244-5. PubMed ID: 16002599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental regulation. New particulate rules are anything but fine, say scientists.
Stokstad E
Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):27. PubMed ID: 16400119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Exposure to contemporary-use pesticides.
Barr DB
J Med Assoc Ga; 1999 Dec; 88(4):34-7. PubMed ID: 10666992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
