These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9672569)
1. The uses and misuses of skepticism: epidemiology and its critics. Ozonoff D Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(4):321-3. PubMed ID: 9672569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. EPA considering raising chloroform goals for drinking water. Public Health Rep; 1998; 113(4):290. PubMed ID: 9672557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Public health. Arsenic epidemiology and drinking water standards. Smith AH; Lopipero PA; Bates MN; Steinmaus CM Science; 2002 Jun; 296(5576):2145-6. PubMed ID: 12077388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental health. Second look at arsenic finds higher risk. Kaiser J Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2189. PubMed ID: 11567118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Chlorine industry says EPA rules ignore good science. Reichhardt T Nature; 1999 Jun; 399(6738):718. PubMed ID: 10391226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Incorporating biologically based models into assessments of risk from chemical contaminants. Bull RJ; Conolly RB; De Marini DM; MacPhail RC; Ohanian EV; Swenberg JA J Am Water Works Assoc; 1993 Mar; 85(3):49-52. PubMed ID: 11538064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is ionizing radiation regulated more stringently than chemical carcinogens? Travis CC; Pack SR; Hattemer-Frey HA Health Phys; 1989 Apr; 56(4):527-31. PubMed ID: 2925392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Arsenic--an old story with big stakes. Schnoor JL Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Feb; 45(3):837. PubMed ID: 21275371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Environmental health. Debate continues over safety of water spiked with rocket fuel. Stokstad E Science; 2005 Jan; 307(5709):507. PubMed ID: 15681361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Plans to reduce acceptable arsenic limit put on hold. Lok C Nature; 2001 Mar; 410(6828):503. PubMed ID: 11279452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pesticides in drinking water: what should be the standard? Harrison WN; Watt BE; Vale JA J Toxicol Clin Toxicol; 2000; 38(2):145-7. PubMed ID: 10778911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The risk assessment of cancer morbidity in the joint action of carcinogens]. Shaĭkina OI; Shaĭkin AB; Kon'shina LG Gig Sanit; 1999; (1):41-3. PubMed ID: 10199078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental health. Academy to mediate debate over rocket-fuel contaminants. Renner R Science; 2003 Mar; 299(5614):1829. PubMed ID: 12649455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cancer risk assessment: importance of identifying mechanisms of action. Bull RJ J Am Water Works Assoc; 1990 Oct; 82(10):57-60. PubMed ID: 11538297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beverages: bottled water. Final rule. Food and Drug Administration, HHS Fed Regist; 2005 Jun; 70(110):33694-701. PubMed ID: 15945150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Drawing the battle lines: tracing the "Science War" in the construction of the chloroform and human health risks debate. Driedger SM; Eyles J Environ Manage; 2003 Apr; 31(4):476-88. PubMed ID: 12677294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]