These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9672956)
1. Positive predictive value for presumptive diagnoses of skin cancer and compliance with follow-up among patients attending a community screening program. Jonna BP; Delfino RJ; Newman WG; Tope WD Prev Med; 1998; 27(4):611-6. PubMed ID: 9672956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical outcomes from skin screening clinics within a community-based melanoma screening program. Aitken JF; Janda M; Elwood M; Youl PH; Ring IT; Lowe JB J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Jan; 54(1):105-14. PubMed ID: 16384764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategies for improving melanoma education and screening for men age >or= 50 years: findings from the American Academy of Dermatological National Skin Cancer Sreening Program. Geller AC; Sober AJ; Zhang Z; Brooks DR; Miller DR; Halpern A; Gilchrest BA Cancer; 2002 Oct; 95(7):1554-61. PubMed ID: 12237925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk factors for presumptive melanoma in skin cancer screening: American Academy of Dermatology National Melanoma/Skin Cancer Screening Program experience 2001-2005. Goldberg MS; Doucette JT; Lim HW; Spencer J; Carucci JA; Rigel DS J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Jul; 57(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 17490783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preliminary results of skin cancer screening in West Virginia. Jubelirer SJ; Carper M; Farmer DE; Milroy SK; Parsons NC; Reynolds HR; Skaff KL W V Med J; 1991 Feb; 87(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 2006560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volunteer melanoma screenings. Follow-up, compliance, and outcome. de Rooij MJ; Rampen FH; Schouten LJ; Neumann HA Dermatol Surg; 1997 Mar; 23(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 9145963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers. dela Cruz GG; Rozier RG; Slade G Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e642-52. PubMed ID: 15520094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What motivates men age > or =50 years to participate in a screening program for melanoma? Janda M; Youl PH; Lowe JB; Baade PD; Elwood M; Ring IT; Aitken JF Cancer; 2006 Aug; 107(4):815-23. PubMed ID: 16832794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for skin cancer in The Netherlands. Krol S; Keijser LM; van der Rhee HJ; Welvaart K Acta Derm Venereol; 1991; 71(4):317-21. PubMed ID: 1681648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sun protection practices among offspring of women with personal or family history of skin cancer. Geller AC; Brooks DR; Colditz GA; Koh HK; Frazier AL Pediatrics; 2006 Apr; 117(4):e688-94. PubMed ID: 16585282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Importance of dermatologic screening within the frame work of a general cancer prevention program]. Lacava V; Salesi N; Ferrone L; Veri A; Lembo R; Masi MC; Rocchi M; Rondinelli R; Parisi E; Grieco T; Balzani A; Clerico R; Innocenzi D; Bottoni U; Calvieri S Minerva Med; 2001 Apr; 92(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 11323570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors associated with the number of lesions excised for each skin cancer: a study of primary care physicians in Queensland, Australia. Baade PD; Youl PH; Janda M; Whiteman DC; Del Mar CB; Aitken JF Arch Dermatol; 2008 Nov; 144(11):1468-76. PubMed ID: 19015421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Melanomas detected with the aid of total cutaneous photography. Feit NE; Dusza SW; Marghoob AA Br J Dermatol; 2004 Apr; 150(4):706-14. PubMed ID: 15099367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skin-cancer screening: a three-year experience that paid for itself. Limpert GH J Fam Pract; 1995 May; 40(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 7730771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate. Piver MS Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of factors associated with skin self-examination. Oliveria SA; Christos PJ; Halpern AC; Fine JA; Barnhill RL; Berwick M Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Nov; 8(11):971-8. PubMed ID: 10566551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Baseline factors influencing decisions on digital follow-up of melanocytic lesions in daily practice: an Italian multicenter survey. Carli P; Ghigliotti G; Gnone M; Chiarugi A; Crocetti E; Astorino S; Berti UA; Broganelli P; Carcaterra A; Corradin MT; Pellacani G; Piccolo D; Risulo M; Stanganelli I; De Giorgi V J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Aug; 55(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 16844508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total skin examination during screening for malignant melanoma does not increase the detection rate. De Rooij MJ; Rampen FH; Schouten LJ; Neumann HA Br J Dermatol; 1996 Jul; 135(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 8776357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the usefulness of self-reported risk factors in a skin cancer screening program. Williams HA; Fritschi L; Beauchamp C; Katris P Melanoma Res; 2006 Aug; 16(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 16845330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of melanoma diagnosis in a community-based screening program. Fritschi L; Dye SA; Katris P Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 164(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 16760225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]