These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9673197)

  • 1. Radiographic parameters for the evaluation of peri-implant tissues.
    Brägger U
    Periodontol 2000; 1994 Feb; 4():87-97. PubMed ID: 9673197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of peri-implant bone change.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS; van den Berg HR; Bertens E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Mar; 3(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 1420723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of changes in peri-implant bone density.
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Lang NP; Buser D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1991; 6(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 1809671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image analysis of intraoral radiographs.
    Nummikoski PV
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 12046405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital subtraction radiography for longitudinal assessment of peri-implant bone change: method and validation.
    Jeffcoat MK; Reddy MS
    Adv Dent Res; 1993 Aug; 7(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 8260008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of radiographs in evaluating success, stability and failure in implant dentistry.
    Brägger U
    Periodontol 2000; 1998 Jun; 17():77-88. PubMed ID: 10337315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of methods to assess marginal bone height around endosseous implants.
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Apr; 20(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 8473534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures.
    Batenburg RH; Meijer HJ; Geraets WG; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 9780899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital subtraction radiography for assessing alveolar bone grafts: diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity.
    Maruko EY; Forbes DP
    Northwest Dent Res; 1993; 4(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 8148133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analytical methodology in quantitative digital subtraction radiography: analyses of the aluminum reference wedge.
    Allen KM; Hausmann E
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1317-21. PubMed ID: 8997679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of contrast enhancement and pseudocolor transformation on the diagnosis with digital subtraction images (DSI).
    Brägger U; Bürgin W; Marconi M; Häsler RU; Lang NP
    J Periodontal Res; 1994 Mar; 29(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 8158504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic determinants of implant performance.
    Reddy MS; Wang IC
    Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():136-45. PubMed ID: 11276736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlations between radiographic, clinical and mobility parameters after loading of oral implants with fixed partial dentures. A 2-year longitudinal study.
    Brägger U; Hugel-Pisoni C; Bürgin W; Buser D; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Sep; 7(3):230-9. PubMed ID: 9151587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles.
    Mengel R; Kruse B; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 16805688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of variations in projection geometry and lesion size on detection of computer-simulated crestal alveolar bone lesions by subtraction radiography.
    Hausmann E; Allen KM; Piedmonte MR
    J Periodontal Res; 1991 Jan; 26(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 1825334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 1-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants.
    Jung YC; Han CH; Lee KW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):811-8. PubMed ID: 8990646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A semi-automated computer-assisted method for measuring bone loss adjacent to dental implants.
    Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo TL; Jeffcoat MK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1992 Mar; 3(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 1420724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A proposed radiographic index for assessment of the current status of osseointegration.
    Nasr HF; Meffert RM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 8225468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective evaluation of crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: the effect of bone grafting at implant placement.
    Koutouzis T; Fetner M; Fetner A; Lundgren T
    J Periodontol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 20731584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA) of bone density in periradicular bone defects healing.
    Katanec D; Kobler P; Slaj M; Anić I; Milosak T
    Coll Antropol; 1998 Dec; 22 Suppl():7-13. PubMed ID: 9951134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.