These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9673920)
1. Laboratory and field evaluation of efficacy of VectoBac 12AS against Culex sitiens (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae. Brown MD; Thomas D; Watson K; Kay BH J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1998 Jun; 14(2):183-5. PubMed ID: 9673920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laboratory evaluation of biotic and abiotic factors that may influence larvicidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar. israelensis against two Florida mosquito species. Nayar JK; Knight JW; Ali A; Carlson DB; O'Bryan PD J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1999 Mar; 15(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 10342266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Indoor thermal fogging against vector mosquitoes with two Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis formulations, Vectobac ABG 6511 water-dispersible granules and Vectobac 12AS liquid. Yap HH; Lee YW; Zairi J J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2002 Mar; 18(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 11998931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of VectoBac (Bacillus thuringiensis variety israelensis) formulations for mosquito control in Australia. Russell TL; Brown MD; Purdie DM; Ryan PA; Kay BH J Econ Entomol; 2003 Dec; 96(6):1786-91. PubMed ID: 14977116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy studies of Vectobac 12as and Teknar HP-D larvicides against 3rd-instar Ochlerotatus taeniorhynchus and Culex quinquefasciatus in small plot field studies. Floore TG; Petersen JL; Shaffer KR J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2004 Dec; 20(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 15669386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laboratory and field efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis var. Israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus against Anopheles gambiae s.l. and Culex quinquefasciatus in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Majori G; Ali A; Sabatinelli G J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1987 Mar; 3(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 3504891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of ULV formulations (Pesguard 102/Vectobac 12AS) against three mosquito species. Yap HH; Chong AS; Adanan CR; Chong NL; Rohaizat B; Malik YA; Lim SY J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1997 Dec; 13(4):384-8. PubMed ID: 9474567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of temperature and concentration of VectoBac on control of the salt-marsh mosquito, Ochlerotatus squamiger, in Monterey County, California. Christiansen JA; McAbee RD; Stanich MA; DeChant P; Boronda D; Cornel AJ J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2004 Jun; 20(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15264626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Field trials of three concentrations of Laginex as biological larvicide compared to Vectobac-12AS as a biocontrol agent for Culex quinquefasciatus. Hallmon CF; Schreiber ET; Vo T; Bloomquist A J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2000 Mar; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 10757483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors affecting the toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus to fourth instar larvae of Chironomus tepperi (Diptera: Chironomidae). Stevens MM; Akhurst RJ; Clifton MA; Hughes PA J Invertebr Pathol; 2004 Jul; 86(3):104-10. PubMed ID: 15261774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laboratory and field evaluation of Bacillus thuringiensis and B. sphaericus against mosquito larvae. Baruah I; Das SC J Commun Dis; 1994 Jun; 26(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 7989680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toxicity of VectoLex (Bacillus sphaericus) products to selected Australian mosquito and nontarget species. Brown ID; Watson TM; Carter J; Purdie DM; Kay BH J Econ Entomol; 2004 Feb; 97(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 14998127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Field evaluation of Vectobac G, Vectobac 12AS and Bactimos WP against the dengue vector Aedes albopictus in tires. Sulaiman S; Pawanchee ZA; Wahab A; Jamal J; Sohadi AR J Vector Ecol; 1997 Dec; 22(2):122-4. PubMed ID: 9491362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laboratory and semi-field evaluation of Mosquito Dunks against Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus larvae (Diptera: Culicidae). Fansiri T; Thavara U; Tawatsin A; Krasaesub S; Sithiprasasna R Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2006 Jan; 37(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 16771214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of Bacillus sphaericus and Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis for control of Culex pipiens and floodwater Aedes larvae in Iowa. Berry WJ; Novak MG; Khounlo S; Rowley WA; Melchior GL J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1987 Dec; 3(4):579-82. PubMed ID: 3504943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficacy of Czechoslovak and Soviet Bacillus thuringiensis (serotype H-14) formulations against mosquito larvae. Rettich F J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987; 31(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 2883232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of granular corncob formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis serovar israelensis against mosquito larvae using a semi-field bioassay method. Ali A; Xue RD; Lobinske R; Carandang N J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1994 Dec; 10(4):492-5. PubMed ID: 7707052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laboratory and field evaluation of Teknar HP-D, a biolarvicidal formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. israelensis, against mosquito vectors. Gunasekaran K; Doss PS; Vaidyanathan K Acta Trop; 2004 Oct; 92(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 15350862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Field trials with Vectolex (Bacillus sphaericus) and Vectobac (Bacillus thuringiensis (H-14)) against Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus breeding in Zaire. Karch S; Manzambi ZA; Salaun JJ J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1991 Jun; 7(2):176-9. PubMed ID: 1895075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of two commercial formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis for the control of Anopheles aquasalis (Diptera: Culicidae) at three salt concentrations. Osborn FR; Herrera MJ; Gómez CJ; Salazar A Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz; 2007 Feb; 102(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 17294002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]