157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9674385)
1. The effect of synergistic epistasis on the inbreeding load.
Charlesworth B
Genet Res; 1998 Feb; 71(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 9674385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accelerated inbreeding depression suggests synergistic epistasis for deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
Domínguez-García S; García C; Quesada H; Caballero A
Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Dec; 123(6):709-722. PubMed ID: 31477803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A measure of the within-chromosome synergistic epistasis for Drosophila viability.
Rosa JM; Camacho S; García-Dorado A
J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1130-7. PubMed ID: 16033587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The decline in fitness with inbreeding: evidence for negative dominance-by-dominance epistasis in Drosophila melanogaster.
Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):857-64. PubMed ID: 26709722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting the genetic load in Drosophila: synergistic epistasis and correlations among fitness components.
Whitlock MC; Bourguet D
Evolution; 2000 Oct; 54(5):1654-60. PubMed ID: 11108592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The action of purifying selection, mutation and drift on fitness epistatic systems.
Pérez-Figueroa A; Caballero A; García-Dorado A; López-Fanjul C
Genetics; 2009 Sep; 183(1):299-313. PubMed ID: 19596902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mutation-selection balance accounting for genetic variation for viability in Drosophila melanogaster as deduced from an inbreeding and artificial selection experiment.
Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Pérez-Figueroa A; Fernández B; Fernández J; Caballero A
J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):528-41. PubMed ID: 15149396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.
Mallet MA; Chippindale AK
Heredity (Edinb); 2011 Jun; 106(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 21119701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mutation load under additive fitness effects.
Bergen AC
Genet Res (Camb); 2015 Feb; 97():e2. PubMed ID: 26788801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of parasitism and inbreeding on the competitive ability in Daphnia magna: evidence for synergistic epistasis.
Salathé P; Ebert D
J Evol Biol; 2003 Sep; 16(5):976-85. PubMed ID: 14635913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The mutation rate and the distribution of mutational effects of viability and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.
García-Dorado A; Monedero JL; López-Fanjul C
Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):255-65. PubMed ID: 9720284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate.
Wang J; Hill WG; Charlesworth D; Charlesworth B
Genet Res; 1999 Oct; 74(2):165-78. PubMed ID: 10584559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The action of stabilizing selection, mutation, and drift on epistatic quantitative traits.
Avila V; Pérez-Figueroa A; Caballero A; Hill WG; García-Dorado A; López-Fanjul C
Evolution; 2014 Jul; 68(7):1974-87. PubMed ID: 24689841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the rate and linearity of viability declines in Drosophila mutation-accumulation experiments: genomic mutation rates and synergistic epistasis revisited.
Fry JD
Genetics; 2004 Feb; 166(2):797-806. PubMed ID: 15020469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response to selection from new mutation and effective size of partially inbred populations. II. Experiments with Drosophila melanogaster.
Merchante M; Caballero A; López-Fanjul C
Genet Res; 1995 Dec; 66(3):227-40. PubMed ID: 8600019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: non-linear divergence among unselected strains.
Mackay TF; Lyman RF; Hill WG
Genetics; 1995 Feb; 139(2):849-59. PubMed ID: 7713436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Negative selection in humans and fruit flies involves synergistic epistasis.
Sohail M; Vakhrusheva OA; Sul JH; Pulit SL; Francioli LC; ; ; van den Berg LH; Veldink JH; de Bakker PIW; Bazykin GA; Kondrashov AS; Sunyaev SR
Science; 2017 May; 356(6337):539-542. PubMed ID: 28473589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of genetic purging under competitive conditions.
López-Cortegano E; Vilas A; Caballero A; García-Dorado A
Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1856-70. PubMed ID: 27302839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Epistatic interactions attenuate mutations affecting startle behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster.
Yamamoto A; Anholt RR; MacKay TF
Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Dec; 91(6):373-82. PubMed ID: 19968911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Synergistic epistasis and alternative hypotheses.
Trouve S; Ding A; Goudet J
J Evol Biol; 2004 Nov; 17(6):1400-1; discussion 1402-4. PubMed ID: 15525424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
