These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

462 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9676680)

  • 1. Evaluating the BMJ guidelines for economic submissions: prospective audit of economic submissions to BMJ and The Lancet.
    Jefferson T; Smith R; Yee Y; Drummond M; Pratt M; Gale R
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):275-7. PubMed ID: 9676680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
    Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Economic evaluation studies in health].
    Rovira-Forns J; Antoñanzas-Villar F
    Med Clin (Barc); 2005 Dec; 125 Suppl 1():61-71. PubMed ID: 16464430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of submissions, editorial and peer-review process, and outcome of manuscripts submitted to the
    Gupta V; Bhatia R; Pathak M; Ramam M
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2020; 86(5):519-525. PubMed ID: 32167071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Making the First Cut: An Analysis of Academic Medicine Editors' Reasons for Not Sending Manuscripts Out for External Peer Review.
    Meyer HS; Durning SJ; Sklar DP; Maggio LA
    Acad Med; 2018 Mar; 93(3):464-470. PubMed ID: 28767495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
    Lamb CR; Adams CA
    Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals.
    Lee KP; Boyd EA; Holroyd-Leduc JM; Bacchetti P; Bero LA
    Med J Aust; 2006 Jun; 184(12):621-6. PubMed ID: 16803442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An audit of the editorial process at the
    Fernandes GJ; Pai SA
    Indian J Cancer; 2021; 58(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 34100409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
    Enquselassie F
    Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party.
    Drummond MF; Jefferson TO
    BMJ; 1996 Aug; 313(7052):275-83. PubMed ID: 8704542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Improving the editing of medical journals and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)].
    Reyes H; Kauffmann R; Andresen M
    Rev Med Chil; 1997 Nov; 125(11):1289-91. PubMed ID: 9609048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes to manuscripts during the editorial process: characterizing the evolution of a clinical paper.
    Purcell GP; Donovan SL; Davidoff F
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):227-8. PubMed ID: 9676663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How do reviewers affect the final outcome? Comparison of the quality of peer review and relative acceptance rates of submitted manuscripts.
    Kurihara Y; Colletti PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):468-70. PubMed ID: 23971437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.
    Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 9676668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
    Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethics, economics, and the publication policies of major medical journals.
    Schulman K; Sulmasy DP; Roney D
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):154-6. PubMed ID: 8015131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts.
    Garfunkel JM; Lawson EE; Hamrick HJ; Ulshen MH
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1376-8. PubMed ID: 2304217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Submitting a manuscript for peer review--integrity, integrity, integrity.
    Murphy SP; Bulman C; Shariati B; Hausmann L;
    J Neurochem; 2014 Feb; 128(3):341-3. PubMed ID: 24410543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors.
    Schroter S; Tite L; Hutchings A; Black N
    JAMA; 2006 Jan; 295(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 16418467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.