217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9676682)
1. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals: islands in search of continents?
Clarke M; Chalmers I
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):280-2. PubMed ID: 9676682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals.
Clarke M; Alderson P; Chalmers I
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2799-801. PubMed ID: 12038916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report.
Clarke M; Hopewell S; Chalmers I
J R Soc Med; 2007 Apr; 100(4):187-90. PubMed ID: 17404342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis.
Hays M; Andrews M; Wilson R; Callender D; O'Malley PG; Douglas K
BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011082. PubMed ID: 27470506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.
Moher D; Jones A; Lepage L;
JAMA; 2001 Apr; 285(15):1992-5. PubMed ID: 11308436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Completeness of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials in subscription and open access journals: cross-sectional study.
Jerčić Martinić-Cezar I; Marušić A
Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):669. PubMed ID: 31791393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials.
Egger M; Jüni P; Bartlett C;
JAMA; 2001 Apr; 285(15):1996-9. PubMed ID: 11308437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals.
Can OS; Yilmaz AA; Hasdogan M; Alkaya F; Turhan SC; Can MF; Alanoglu Z
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):485-92. PubMed ID: 21037480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Brief report: inadequate description and discussion of enrolled patient characteristics and potential inter-study site differences in reports of randomized controlled trials: a systematic survey in six rheumatology journals.
Yurdakul S; Mustafa BN; Fresko I; Seyahi E; Yazici H
Arthritis Rheumatol; 2014 May; 66(5):1395-9. PubMed ID: 24782196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time.
Goldacre B; Drysdale H; Dale A; Milosevic I; Slade E; Hartley P; Marston C; Powell-Smith A; Heneghan C; Mahtani KR
Trials; 2019 Feb; 20(1):118. PubMed ID: 30760329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery.
Kiehna EN; Starke RM; Pouratian N; Dumont AS
J Neurosurg; 2011 Feb; 114(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 21054137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endorsement for improving the quality of reports on randomized controlled trials of traditional medicine journals in Korea: a systematic review.
Choi J; Jun JH; Kang BK; Kim KH; Lee MS
Trials; 2014 Nov; 15():429. PubMed ID: 25373427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying the CONSORT and STROBE statements to evaluate the reporting quality of neovascular age-related macular degeneration studies.
Fung AE; Palanki R; Bakri SJ; Depperschmidt E; Gibson A
Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):286-96. PubMed ID: 19091408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reporting number needed to treat and absolute risk reduction in randomized controlled trials.
Nuovo J; Melnikow J; Chang D
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2813-4. PubMed ID: 12038920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
Berwanger O; Ribeiro RA; Finkelsztejn A; Watanabe M; Suzumura EA; Duncan BB; Devereaux PJ; Cook D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19010643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A systematic review.
Milette K; Roseman M; Thombs BD
J Psychosom Res; 2011 Mar; 70(3):205-17. PubMed ID: 21334491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in otorhinolaryngologic literature - adherence to the CONSORT statement.
Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0122328. PubMed ID: 25793517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CONSORT in China: past development and future direction.
Song TJ; Leng HF; Zhong LL; Wu TX; Bian ZX
Trials; 2015 Jun; 16():243. PubMed ID: 26026311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
Mathieu S; Boutron I; Moher D; Altman DG; Ravaud P
JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(9):977-84. PubMed ID: 19724045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
