These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9676691)

  • 1. Freedom and responsibility in medical publication: setting the balance right.
    Rennie D
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):300-2. PubMed ID: 9676691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reviewers, authors, and editors: balance of power.
    Bressler NM
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1999 Apr; 117(4):524-6. PubMed ID: 10206584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thoughts of a manuscript reviewer.
    Bluestone N
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 9074317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrity of Authorship and Peer Review Practices: Challenges and Opportunities for Improvement.
    Misra DP; Ravindran V; Agarwal V
    J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 33(46):e287. PubMed ID: 30416407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistics, authors, and reviewers: the heart of the matter.
    Curran-Everett D; Benos DJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):80. PubMed ID: 19261765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The editorial process for medical journals: I. Introduction of a series and discussion of the responsibilities of editors, authors, and reviewers.
    Liesegang TJ; Albert DM; Schachat AP; Minckler DS
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 12834678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer Reviewers Advance Excellence in Infusion Nursing.
    Alexander M
    J Infus Nurs; 2019; 42(2):59. PubMed ID: 30817420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is Peer Review Still Anonymous?
    Ritchie AI; Polkey MI; Donaldson GC; Wedzicha JA
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2018 Jul; 198(2):278-280. PubMed ID: 29537300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
    Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Media mania, megalomania and misleading research: the need for caution in scientific publication.
    Higgins A
    Vet J; 2003 Nov; 166(3):213-4. PubMed ID: 14550726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quality assurance in publications].
    Rothmund M
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1992 Nov; 117(48):1854-8. PubMed ID: 1451652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why 5 Years?
    Olson DM
    J Neurosci Nurs; 2017 Apr; 49(2):64. PubMed ID: 28277446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Control of data, authorship, and responsibility for clinical trials publications.
    Freeman WR
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Sep; 112(9):1485-6. PubMed ID: 16139664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What do journal editors want? … and everything you wanted to know about the peer review process for journal publication.
    Muir-Cochrane E
    Nurs Health Sci; 2013 Sep; 15(3):263-4. PubMed ID: 24021114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tips for writing and publishing an article.
    Nahata MC
    Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cultivating peer review.
    Dellavalle RP
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2006 Dec; 55(6):1113-5. PubMed ID: 17097410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Valuing peer reviewers: accreditation for reviewers.
    Ahmed S
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 45(4):407-408. PubMed ID: 31814139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts.
    Garfunkel JM; Lawson EE; Hamrick HJ; Ulshen MH
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1376-8. PubMed ID: 2304217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review: an essential step in the publishing process.
    Weil J
    J Genet Couns; 2004 Jun; 13(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 15617209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.