These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9676813)

  • 1. Cine film replacement: digital archival requirements and remaining obstacles.
    Holmes DR; Wondrow MA; Bell MR; Nissen SE; Cusma JT
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1998 Jul; 44(3):346-56; discussion 357. PubMed ID: 9676813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The hemodynamics laboratory without cine film. A comparison between the production costs of 35-mm film and the recordable compact disk].
    Danzi GB; Fiocca L; Dallavalle F; Capuano C; Chioin R; Riva S; Quaini E
    G Ital Cardiol; 1998 Aug; 28(8):887-92. PubMed ID: 9773314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The digital cardiac network: today and the future.
    Katz S
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998; 14 Suppl 1():23-5. PubMed ID: 10091083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of DICOM on QCA and clinical trials.
    Reiber JH; Koning G; Goedhart B
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998; 14 Suppl 1():7-12. PubMed ID: 10091079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiac angiography without cine film: erecting a "Tower of Babel" in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. American College of Cardiology Cardiac Catheterization Committee.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Sep; 24(3):834-7. PubMed ID: 8077561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Replacement of cinefilm with a digital archive and review network.
    Cusma JT; Wondrow MA; Holmes DR
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 10453381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Information management in the cardiology department. An analysis of current options for replacing cinefilm.
    Van Meurs BF
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995; 11 Suppl 3():159-63. PubMed ID: 7594744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Filmless cardiac imaging: motion or commotion?
    Vastenaeken GD
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998; 14 Suppl 1():19-22. PubMed ID: 10091082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital networking and archiving with ACOM T.O.P.
    Saalfrank W
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 10453385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of the financial impacts of optical disk storage for digital radiography.
    Stockburger WT
    Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 10284737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolution of the filmless cardiac angiography suite: promise and perils of the evolving digital era.
    Nissen SE
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Aug; 78(3A):41-4. PubMed ID: 8751846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative imaging technologies in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Condit PB
    J Cardiovasc Manag; 1993; 4(5):19-20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 10129576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Causes of cine image quality deterioration in cardiac catheterization laboratories.
    Levin DC; Dunham LR; Stueve R
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Oct; 52(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 6624682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing availability of the electronic image record for patients and caregivers during follow-up care.
    Mehta A; Dreyer K; Thrall J
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):78-80. PubMed ID: 10342173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Requirements for cardiac interchange media and the role of recordable CD.
    Condit PB
    Int J Card Imaging; 1995; 11 Suppl 3():153-7. PubMed ID: 7594743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrated image storage solution for the Cath department.
    Weterings RA
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):349-56. PubMed ID: 10453389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Kodak approach to digital cardiovascular imaging laboratories.
    Pelanek GA
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Oct; 14(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 10453387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative coronary arteriography: current status and future.
    Reiber JH; Goedhart B; Brand GJ; Schiemanck L; van der Zwet PM
    Heart Vessels; 1997; Suppl 12():209-11. PubMed ID: 9476585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flat-panel detectors in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: revolution or evolution-what are the issues?
    Holmes DR; Laskey WK; Wondrow MA; Cusma JT
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Nov; 63(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 15505837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of 35 mm cine film and digital radiographic image recording: implications for quantitative coronary arteriography. Film vs. digital coronary quantification.
    LeFree MT; Simon SB; Mancini GB; Bates ER; Vogel RA
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Mar; 23(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 3372175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.