These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9677759)

  • 1. [Numerical studies of the effect of prosthetic implants on the strain energy density distribution in the femur].
    Liefeith K; Kaufhold S; Rost J
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998 Jun; 43(6):179-83. PubMed ID: 9677759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Medium-term results of anatomic straight-shaft IMAGE implantation in primary hip joint endoprosthetics--a prospective study].
    Lorenz U; Forke L; Irlenbusch U
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 20563971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty].
    Götze C; Ehrenbrink J; Ehrenbrink H
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug; 148(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20714981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of prosthesis shaft coating on postoperative load bearing of the femur].
    Baroud G; Willmann G; Kreissig R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43(1-2):25-8. PubMed ID: 9542285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effect of substance and length of intramedullary implant rods of special tumor prostheses on bone canal].
    Steinhauser E; Rechl H; Schaff P; Gradinger R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():378-9. PubMed ID: 9859407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Fully automated generation of hip prosthesis voxel models of the femur for finite element analysis. Comparison of direct and subsequent prosthesis implantation].
    Schmitt J; Lengsfeld M; Leppek R; Alter P
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1997 Jun; 42(6):150-5. PubMed ID: 9312305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numerical investigations of stress shielding in total hip prostheses.
    Behrens BA; Wirth CJ; Windhagen H; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Bouguecha A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 Jul; 222(5):593-600. PubMed ID: 18756678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulation of physiological loading in total hip replacements.
    Ramos A; Fonseca F; Simões JA
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):579-87. PubMed ID: 16813449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Photoelastic stress analysis of human femurs before and after implantation of different models of femur neck prostheses].
    Wieners G; Pech M; Streitparth F; Jansson V; Plitz W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2007; 145(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 17345548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of proximal femoral support in stress development within hip prostheses.
    Crowninshield RD; Maloney WJ; Wentz DH; Levine DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Mar; (420):176-80. PubMed ID: 15057094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone remodelling of a proximal femur with the thrust plate prosthesis: an in vitro case.
    Taylor WR; Ploeg H; Hertig D; Warner MD; Clift SE
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2004 Jun; 7(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 15512756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs.
    Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Gubaua JE; Pereira JT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Dec; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Musculoskeletal-based finite element analysis of femur after total hip replacement.
    Meena VK; Kumar M; Pundir A; Singh S; Goni V; Kalra P; Sinha RK
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jun; 230(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 27006421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Dynamic force measurement in implantation of total endoprostheses of the hip joint].
    Schmidbauer U; Brendel T; Kunze KG; Nietert M; Ecke H
    Unfallchirurgie; 1993 Feb; 19(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 8465463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Load-transfer analysis after insertion of cementless anatomical femoral stem using pre- and post-operative CT images based patient-specific finite element analysis.
    Yamako G; Chosa E; Zhao X; Totoribe K; Watanabe S; Sakamoto T; Nakane N
    Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jun; 36(6):694-700. PubMed ID: 24629623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Load shift-total hip replacement--numerical and clinical evaluation of a new concept of adaptive stem fixation].
    Lampe F; Nassutt R; Götzen N; Honl M; Dries S; Kokenge T; Morlock MM; Hille E
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):657-64. PubMed ID: 14679431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Torsion forces of the proximal femur following implantation of a hip prostheses].
    Bettermann A; Ecke H; Nietert M
    Unfallchirurgie; 1988 Oct; 14(5):233-7. PubMed ID: 3238816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mapping the strain distribution on the proximal femur with titanium and flexible-stemmed implants using digital image correlation.
    Tayton E; Evans S; O'Doherty D
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Aug; 92(8):1176-81. PubMed ID: 20675768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Numerical analysis of an osseointegrated prosthesis fixation with reduced bone failure risk and periprosthetic bone loss.
    Tomaszewski PK; van Diest M; Bulstra SK; Verdonschot N; Verkerke GJ
    J Biomech; 2012 Jul; 45(11):1875-80. PubMed ID: 22677337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.