BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9678042)

  • 1. Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Eckstein F; Schnier M; Haubner M; Priebsch J; Glaser C; Englmeier KH; Reiser M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Jul; (352):137-48. PubMed ID: 9678042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Three-dimensional thickness and volume measurements of the knee joint cartilage using MRI: validation in an anatomical specimen by CT arthrography].
    Schnier M; Eckstein F; Priebsch J; Haubner M; Sittek H; Becker C; Putz R; Englmeier KH; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1997 Nov; 167(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9440900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Three-dimensional thickness and volume measurements of the knee joint cartilage by MR tomography: reproducibility in volunteers].
    Westhoff J; Eckstein F; Sittek H; Lösch A; Faber S; Kolem H; Englmeier KH; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1997 Dec; 167(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 9465953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeatability of patellar cartilage thickness patterns in the living, using a fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging sequence with short acquisition time and three-dimensional data processing.
    Tieschky M; Faber S; Haubner M; Kolem H; Schulte E; Englmeier KH; Reiser M; Eckstein F
    J Orthop Res; 1997 Nov; 15(6):808-13. PubMed ID: 9497804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging.
    Eckstein F; Westhoff J; Sittek H; Maag KP; Haubner M; Faber S; Englmeier KH; Reiser M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 9490936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Noninvasive analysis of cartilage volume and cartilage thickness in the human elbow joint using MRI].
    Springer V; Graichen H; Stammberger T; Englmeier KH; Reiser M; Eckstein F
    Ann Anat; 1998 Aug; 180(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 9728274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Knee joint cartilage in magnetic resonance tomography. MR chondrovolumetry (MR-CVM) using fat-suppressed FLASH 3D sequence].
    Eckstein F; Sittek H; Gavazzeni A; Milz S; Kiefer B; Putz R; Reiser M
    Radiologe; 1995 Feb; 35(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 7740121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitation of articular cartilage using magnetic resonance imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction.
    Marshall KW; Mikulis DJ; Guthrie BM
    J Orthop Res; 1995 Nov; 13(6):814-23. PubMed ID: 8544016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-aided method for quantification of cartilage thickness and volume changes using MRI: validation study using a synthetic model.
    Kauffmann C; Gravel P; Godbout B; Gravel A; Beaudoin G; Raynauld JP; Martel-Pelletier J; Pelletier JP; de Guise JA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Aug; 50(8):978-88. PubMed ID: 12892325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [NMR tomography of the cartilage structures of the knee joint with 3D-volume imaging combined with a rapid optical-imaging computer].
    Adam G; Bohndorf K; Prescher A; Drobnitzky M; Günther RW
    Rofo; 1989 Jan; 150(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 2536495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of cartilage volume in the femorotibial joint with magnetic resonance imaging and 3D computer reconstruction.
    Pilch L; Stewart C; Gordon D; Inman R; Parsons K; Pataki I; Stevens J
    J Rheumatol; 1994 Dec; 21(12):2307-21. PubMed ID: 7699634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging of knee cartilage using a water selective balanced steady-state free precession sequence.
    Kornaat PR; Doornbos J; van der Molen AJ; Kloppenburg M; Nelissen RG; Hogendoorn PC; Bloem JL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):850-6. PubMed ID: 15503345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of ex vivo focal cartilage defects.
    Graichen H; Al-Shamari D; Hinterwimmer S; von Eisenhart-Rothe R; Vogl T; Eckstein F
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2005 Aug; 64(8):1120-5. PubMed ID: 15640266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
    Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cartilage volume quantification via Live Wire segmentation.
    Gougoutas AJ; Wheaton AJ; Borthakur A; Shapiro EM; Kneeland JB; Udupa JK; Reddy R
    Acad Radiol; 2004 Dec; 11(12):1389-95. PubMed ID: 15596377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Articular cartilage volume in the knee: semiautomated determination from three-dimensional reformations of MR images.
    Piplani MA; Disler DG; McCauley TR; Holmes TJ; Cousins JP
    Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):855-9. PubMed ID: 8628883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage.
    Disler DG; McCauley TR
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Dec; 9(6):360-76. PubMed ID: 9894739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
    Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of quantitative cartilage measurements acquired on two 3.0T MRI systems from different manufacturers.
    Kornaat PR; Koo S; Andriacchi TP; Bloem JL; Gold GE
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 May; 23(5):770-3. PubMed ID: 16568430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fat suppression gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of experimental articular cartilage lesions: comparison between phase-contrast method at 0.23T and chemical shift selective method at 1.5T.
    Palosaari K; Ojala R; Blanco-Sequeiros R; Tervonen O
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Aug; 18(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 12884336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.