These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9678071)

  • 1. Sonographic characteristics of various types of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Rabinerson D; Kaplan B; Bar J; Dekel A; Neri A; Caspi B
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 1998 Mar; 3(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 9678071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sonographic appearances of Chinese intrauterine devices.
    Cheung VY
    J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jul; 29(7):1093-101. PubMed ID: 20587433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New observations in the sonographic evaluation of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Najarian KE; Kurtz AB
    J Ultrasound Med; 1986 Apr; 5(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 3514951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrauterine device failure: relation to its location within the uterine cavity.
    Anteby E; Revel A; Ben-Chetrit A; Rosen B; Tadmor O; Yagel S
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jan; 81(1):112-4. PubMed ID: 8416443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasonographically guided intrauterine contraceptive device removal before chorionic villus sampling.
    Ranzini AC; Wapner RJ; Davis GH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):603-5. PubMed ID: 7645641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sonographic images of a lost intrauterine device.
    Zalel Y; Kreizer D; Achiron R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):376-7. PubMed ID: 10380311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Ultra sonography for the localization of intra-uterine contraceptive devices (i.u.d.'s) (author's transl)].
    Meyenburg M
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1978 Nov; 38(11):950-7. PubMed ID: 710881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Color Doppler sonographic study of the uterine artery in patients using intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Frajndlich R; von Eye Corleta H; Frantz N
    J Ultrasound Med; 2000 Aug; 19(8):577-9. PubMed ID: 10944044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Penetration of the bladder by a perforating intrauterine contraceptive device: a sonographic diagnosis.
    Caspi B; Rabinerson D; Appelman Z; Kaplan B
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jun; 7(6):458-60. PubMed ID: 8807768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three intrauterine contraceptive devices in a single uterus.
    Nanda S; Rathee S
    Trop Doct; 1992 Jan; 22(1):33-4. PubMed ID: 1542950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imaging of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Peri N; Graham D; Levine D
    J Ultrasound Med; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1389-401. PubMed ID: 17901142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Control of intrauterine device insertion with three-dimensional ultrasound: is it the future?
    Bonilla-Musoles F; Raga F; Osborne NG; Blanes J
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 Jun; 24(5):263-7. PubMed ID: 8723515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device to the urinary bladder: sonographic findings.
    Mahmutyazicioğlu K; Ozdemir H; Ozkan P
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2002 Oct; 30(8):496-8. PubMed ID: 12242738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intrauterine contraceptive devices: evaluation by sonography.
    Callen PW; Filly RA; Munyer TP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Oct; 135(4):797-800. PubMed ID: 6778115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Immediate postplacental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: randomized study.
    Tatum HJ; Beltran RS; Ramos R; Van Kets H; Sivin I; Schmidt FH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Nov; 175(5):1231-5. PubMed ID: 8942493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intrauterine contraceptive device and embryo sharing a bicornuate uterus: case report.
    Furst A; Harats H; Mor-Yosef S
    Br J Gen Pract; 1992 Mar; 42(356):129-30. PubMed ID: 1493031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sonographic demonstration of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Watt I; Watt E; Halliwell M; Ross FG
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1977 Dec; 5(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 412865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sonographic and Doppler flow characteristics of levonorgestrel and copper-releasing intrauterine devices.
    Zalel Y
    MedGenMed; 2003 Jun; 5(2):38. PubMed ID: 14603137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is the fate of the missing intrauterine contraceptive device?
    Ibitoye BO; Aremu AA; Onuwaje MA; Ayoola OO
    Trop Doct; 2009 Oct; 39(4):221-3. PubMed ID: 19762575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intravesical migration of an intrauterine device.
    Gyasi-Sarpong CK; Maison PO; Morhe E; Aboah K; Appiah KA; Azorliade R; Baah-Nyamekye K; Otu-Boateng K; Amoah G; Antwi I; Frimpong-Twumasi B; Arthur D
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jan; 9():4. PubMed ID: 26724805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.