194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9678885)
1. Changes in the dimensions of milled mandibular models after mandibular sagittal split osteotomies.
Schultes G; Gaggl A; Kärcher H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Jun; 36(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 9678885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of mandibular ramus morphology using computed tomography in patients with mandibular prognathism and retrognathia: relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Noleto JW; Marchiori E; Da Silveira HM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 68(8):1788-94. PubMed ID: 20493618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Study of condylar positional changes after sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement: A prospective cohort study.
Costas A; Sanromán JF; Castro P; Ferro MF; Lopez A; Stavaru B
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 46(7):1079-1090. PubMed ID: 29773499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of ramus, condyle, masseter muscle, and occlusal force before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in patients with mandibular prognathism.
Ueki K; Okabe K; Mukozawa A; Miyazaki M; Marukawa K; Hashiba Y; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Nov; 108(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 19699116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mandibular remodeling after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for prognathism of the mandible.
Huang CS; de Villa GH; Liou EJ; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 16413885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revisiting the supraforaminal horizontal oblique osteotomy of the mandible.
Kaduk WM; Podmelle F; Louis PJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):421-8. PubMed ID: 21684657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Results of measurement of pre- and postoperative milling models of orthodontic-surgical treatment of dysgnathia patients].
Schultes G; Gaggl A; Kärcher H
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1998 May; 2 Suppl 1():S139-44. PubMed ID: 9658841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postoperative mandibular stability after orthognathic surgery in patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation.
Lai W; Yamada K; Hanada K; Ali IM; Takagi R; Kobayashi T; Hayashi T
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 11934051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Horizontal changes in the condylar head after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with bent plate fixation.
Ueki K; Degerliyurt K; Hashiba Y; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Nov; 106(5):656-61. PubMed ID: 18602292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Results of measurement of pre- and postoperative milling models from patients with dysgnathism after orthognathic surgery].
Schultes G; Gaggl A; Kärcher H
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1998 May; 2(Suppl 1):S139-44. PubMed ID: 23525995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An adjustable bone fixation system for sagittal split ramus osteotomy: preliminary report.
Joos U
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Apr; 37(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 10371309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-sectional tomography in evaluation of patients undergoing sagittal split osteotomy.
Hallikainen D; Iizuka T; Lindqvist C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Dec; 50(12):1269-73. PubMed ID: 1447604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physiological positioning strategy alters condylar position after mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomies for mandibular prognathism.
Ohba S; Ozaki H; Miura KI; Koga T; Kawasaki T; Yoshida N; Asahina I
Cranio; 2018 May; 36(3):181-188. PubMed ID: 28391764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of mandibular setback via bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on transverse displacement of the proximal segment.
Choi HS; Rebellato J; Yoon HJ; Lund BA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 63(7):908-16. PubMed ID: 16003615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oblique osteotomy and coronoidectomy in extreme prognathism of Apert syndrome.
Hwang K; Kim DH
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):555-6. PubMed ID: 20216439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: techniques and rationale of the intraoral vertico-sagittal ramus osteotomy.
Choung PH
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1992; 20(4):153-62. PubMed ID: 1629365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
