These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9680703)

  • 1. Uncertainty--a chemist's view.
    Horwitz W
    J AOAC Int; 1998; 81(4):785-94. PubMed ID: 9680703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian approach for application to method validation and measurement uncertainty.
    Saffaj T; Ihssane B
    Talanta; 2012 Apr; 92():15-25. PubMed ID: 22385803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The certainty of uncertainty.
    Horwitz W
    J AOAC Int; 2003; 86(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 12607748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of quality-by-design analytical methods.
    Vogt FG; Kord AS
    J Pharm Sci; 2011 Mar; 100(3):797-812. PubMed ID: 21280050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Models to estimate overall analytical measurements uncertainty: assumptions, comparisons and applications.
    Rozet E; Rudaz S; Marini RD; Ziémons E; Boulanger B; Hubert P
    Anal Chim Acta; 2011 Sep; 702(2):160-71. PubMed ID: 21839193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling uncertainty in the measurement of low-level analytes in environmental analysis.
    Rocke DM; Durbin B; Wilson M; Kahn HD
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2003 Sep; 56(1):78-92. PubMed ID: 12915142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Closed-form confidence intervals on measures of precision for an interlaboratory study.
    Nijhuis MB; van den Heuvel ER
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):123-42. PubMed ID: 17219759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of uncertainty in quantitative real-time PCR.
    Love JL; Scholes P; Gilpin B; Savill M; Lin S; Samuel L
    J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Nov; 67(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 16735069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts.
    Augustin JC; Carlier V
    Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 23(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 16942983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncertainty profiles for the validation of analytical methods.
    Saffaj T; Ihssane B
    Talanta; 2011 Sep; 85(3):1535-42. PubMed ID: 21807219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Error propagation in pesticide residue measurements estimated by computational simulations and inter-laboratory sample analysis.
    Nanita SC; Ziegler M; Giammarrusti L; Huber A; Astor E; Ruhl JC
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2009 Sep; 44(7):640-8. PubMed ID: 20183073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the confidence interval of the mean to detect systematic errors in one analytical run.
    Asberg A; Bolann B; Mikkelsen G
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2010 Oct; 70(6):410-4. PubMed ID: 20602577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between measurement uncertainty and reporting interval.
    Badrick T; Hawkins RC
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2015 Jan; 52(Pt 1):177-9. PubMed ID: 24818615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the measurement uncertainty: Some common mistakes with a focus on the uncertainty from linear calibration.
    Kadis R
    J Chromatogr A; 2017 May; 1499():226-229. PubMed ID: 28410803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncertainties of method performance statistics based on a balanced completely randomized model interlaboratory study.
    McClure FD; Lee JK
    J AOAC Int; 2008; 91(3):660-9. PubMed ID: 18567314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the order of hierarchical structures for the calculation of method uncertainty using nested and other designs.
    Durden DA
    J AOAC Int; 2011; 94(5):1643-9. PubMed ID: 22165030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance characteristics of a composite multivariate quality control system.
    Caudill SP; Smith SJ; Pirkle JL; Ashley DL
    Anal Chem; 1992 Jul; 64(13):1390-5. PubMed ID: 1503216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpretation of interlaboratory trials based on accuracy profiles.
    Feinberg M; Granier G; Mermet JM
    J AOAC Int; 2010; 93(2):725-33. PubMed ID: 20480921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of interlaboratory performance in the determination of total selenium in water.
    Steinhoff PJ; Smith BW; Warner DW; Möller G
    J AOAC Int; 1999; 82(6):1466-73. PubMed ID: 10589498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bootstrap method for the estimation of measurement uncertainty in spotted dual-color DNA microarrays.
    Karakach TK; Flight RM; Wentzell PD
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2007 Dec; 389(7-8):2125-41. PubMed ID: 17899024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.