These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9680762)

  • 41. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Force needed to separate acrylic resin from primed and unprimed frameworks of different designs.
    Lee G; Engelmeier RL; Gonzalez M; Powers JM; Perezous LF; O'Keefe KL
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Jan; 19(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 19682221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Analysis of retention and wear of ball attachments.
    Wolf K; Ludwig K; Hartfil H; Kern M
    Quintessence Int; 2009 May; 40(5):405-12. PubMed ID: 19582245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. New mini dental implant attachments versus O-ring attachment after cyclic aging: Analysis of retention strength and gap space.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Cao YG
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2017 Jun; 37(3):419-424. PubMed ID: 28585142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Mechanical studies on dental magnetic attachments].
    Ishikawa S
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Mar; 60(1):98-120. PubMed ID: 8482913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dental magnetic attachment: toward third generation devices.
    Tegawa Y; Kinouchi Y
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1185-90. PubMed ID: 18334412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Retentive force and magnetic flux leakage of magnetic attachment in various keeper and magnetic assembly combinations.
    Hasegawa M; Umekawa Y; Nagai E; Ishigami T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Apr; 105(4):266-71. PubMed ID: 21458652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Maximum dislodging forces of mandibular implant-assisted removable partial dentures: in vitro assessment.
    Gharehchahi J; Asadzadeh N; Mirmortazavi A; Shakeri MT
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Oct; 22(7):543-549. PubMed ID: 23551954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of cast Ti-Ni alloy clasp retention with conventional removable partial denture clasps.
    Kim D; Park C; Yi Y; Cho L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):374-82. PubMed ID: 15116040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Retentive characteristics of different dental magnetic systems.
    Akaltan F; Can G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Oct; 74(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 8531164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of magnetic attachment with stress breaker on lateral stress to abutment tooth under overdenture.
    Gonda T; Ikebe K; Ono T; Nokubi T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct; 31(10):1001-6. PubMed ID: 15387841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. In Vitro Effects of Cyclic Dislodgement on Retentive Properties of Various Titanium-Based Dental Implant Overdentures Attachment System.
    Kang TY; Kim JH; Kim KM; Kwon JS
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Nov; 12(22):. PubMed ID: 31744164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
    Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
    Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Corrosion of dental magnet attachments for removable prostheses on teeth and implants.
    Boeckler AF; Ehring C; Morton D; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Setz JM
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 18(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 19210309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
    Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effect of spatial arrangement and clinical service lifetime simulation on the retention of magnetic units used in implant-anchored orbital prostheses.
    Artopoulou II; Zinelis S; Lemon JC; Polyzois G; Chambers MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):811.e1-811.e9. PubMed ID: 36890002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Removable magnetic dental attachment that permits magnetic resonance imaging.
    Masumi S; Nagatomi K; Miyake S; Toyoda S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):698-701. PubMed ID: 1403952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Occlusal force transmission by overdenture attachments.
    Thayer HH; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Mar; 41(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 368317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.