These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9682315)
1. Is work status of low back pain patients best described by an automated device or by a questionnaire? Loisel P; Poitras S; Lemaire J; Durand P; Southière A; Abenhaim L Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jul; 23(14):1588-94; discussion 1595. PubMed ID: 9682315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Disability measurement in persons with back pain: a validity study of spinal range of motion and velocity. Poitras S; Loisel P; Prince F; Lemaire J Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Oct; 81(10):1394-400. PubMed ID: 11030506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain. Grotle M; Brox JI; Vøllestad NK Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(21):E492-501. PubMed ID: 15507789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discriminative and predictive validity assessment of the quebec task force classification. Loisel P; Vachon B; Lemaire J; Durand MJ; Poitras S; Stock S; Tremblay C Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(8):851-7. PubMed ID: 11935108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychosocial variables in patients with (sub)acute low back pain: an inception cohort in primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands. Heneweer H; Aufdemkampe G; van Tulder MW; Kiers H; Stappaerts KH; Vanhees L Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 17334295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longitudinal quantitative measures of the natural course of low back pain recovery. Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Gupta P Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Aug; 25(15):1950-6. PubMed ID: 10908939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v2.1 and Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain. Frost H; Lamb SE; Stewart-Brown S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2450-7; discussion 2458. PubMed ID: 18824951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychological questionnaires: do "abnormal" scores precede or follow first-time low back pain? Mannion AF; Dolan P; Adams MA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Nov; 21(22):2603-11. PubMed ID: 8961448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of Waddell's nonorganic signs in predicting a delayed return to regular work in patients experiencing acute occupational low back pain. Gaines WG; Hegmann KT Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(4):396-400; discussion 401. PubMed ID: 10065525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the functional rating index and the 18-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire: responsiveness and reliability. Chansirinukor W; Maher CG; Latimer J; Hush J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jan; 30(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 15626994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain. Pengel LH; Refshauge KM; Maher CG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(8):879-83. PubMed ID: 15082988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A screening questionnaire to predict no return to work within 3 months for low back pain claimants. Du Bois M; Donceel P Eur Spine J; 2008 Mar; 17(3):380-385. PubMed ID: 18172698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Responsiveness of generic and specific measures of health outcome in low back pain. Garratt AM; Klaber Moffett J; Farrin AJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jan; 26(1):71-7; discussion 77. PubMed ID: 11148649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain. Taylor SJ; Taylor AE; Foy MA; Fogg AJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Sep; 24(17):1805-12. PubMed ID: 10488511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires: a reliability study. Holm I; Friis A; Storheim K; Brox JI Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):828-33. PubMed ID: 12698128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Construct validity and responsiveness of the single-item presenteeism question in patients with lower back pain for the measurement of presenteeism. Kigozi J; Lewis M; Jowett S; Barton P; Coast J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):409-16. PubMed ID: 24365900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Responsiveness and interpretability of the Portuguese version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale in patients with chronic low back pain. Vieira AC; Moniz S; Fernandes R; Carnide F; Cruz EB Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):E346-52. PubMed ID: 24573078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Danish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement in two low back pain populations. Lauridsen HH; Hartvigsen J; Manniche C; Korsholm L; Grunnet-Nilsson N Eur Spine J; 2006 Nov; 15(11):1717-28. PubMed ID: 16736202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the Hausa version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire in patients with low back pain. Ibrahim AA; Akindele MO; Kaka B; Bello B Scand J Pain; 2019 Jan; 19(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 30412467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) for low back disorders: a validation study from Iran. Azimi P; Shahzadi S; Montazeri A J Orthop Sci; 2012 Sep; 17(5):521-5. PubMed ID: 22821408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]