These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9682562)

  • 21. CAD/CAM fabrication and clinical application of surgical template and bone model in oral implant surgery.
    Sohmura T; Kusumoto N; Otani T; Yamada S; Wakabayashi K; Yatani H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 19126112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Precise dental implant placement in bone using surgical guides in conjunction with medical imaging techniques.
    Fortin T; Champleboux G; Lormée J; Coudert JL
    J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(4):300-3. PubMed ID: 11831236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of transitional implants to support a surgical guide: enhancing the accuracy of implant placement.
    Simon H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Feb; 87(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 11854682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
    Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
    J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of a newly developed open-source system for dental implant planning.
    Dreiseidler T; Tandon D; Ritter L; Neugebauer J; Mischkowski RA; Scheer M; Zöller JE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):128-37. PubMed ID: 22299089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Implants placement using a novel computerized tactile imaging navigation system].
    Tal H; Shohat M
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2005 Jan; 22(1):19-26, 84. PubMed ID: 15786656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
    Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of template-based dental implant placement.
    Eggers G; Patellis E; Mühling J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):447-54. PubMed ID: 19587866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Magnetic resonance tomography for planning dental implantation].
    Hassfeld S; Fiebach J; Widmann S; Heiland S; Mühling J
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2001 May; 5(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11432335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bone density at implant sites and its relationship to assessment of bone quality and treatment outcome.
    Bergkvist G; Koh KJ; Sahlholm S; Klintström E; Lindh C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 20369091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
    Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL
    J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Short dental implants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: Three-year results of a randomized clinical study.
    Taschieri S; Lolato A; Testori T; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 29193558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
    Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stereolithographic surgical templates for placement of dental implants in complex cases.
    Sarment DP; Al-Shammari K; Kazor CE
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Jun; 23(3):287-95. PubMed ID: 12854779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation.
    Lundgren S; Andersson S; Gualini F; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2004; 6(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 15726851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous placement of implants--a 1-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants.
    Fermergård R; Astrand P
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 18254742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla with sinus elevation without bone grafting: a 2-year prospective study.
    Rajkumar GC; Aher V; Ramaiya S; Manjunath GS; Kumar DV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):526-30. PubMed ID: 23527355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Preoperative planning for the placement of a single implant].
    Jacobs R
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 May; 106(5):187-90. PubMed ID: 11930365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.