146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9683097)
1. Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health care.
Ryan M; McIntosh E; Shackley P
Health Econ; 1998 Jun; 7(4):373-8. PubMed ID: 9683097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of patient satisfaction questionnaires: I. Methodological issues.
Bamford C; Jacoby A
Qual Health Care; 1992 Sep; 1(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 10136854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of conjoint analysis to elicit community preferences in public health research: a case study of hospital services in South Australia.
Jan S; Mooney G; Ryan M; Bruggemann K; Alexander K
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2000 Feb; 24(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 10777981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and validity of a new measure of patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care in the United Kingdom: development of a patient questionnaire.
McKinley RK; Manku-Scott T; Hastings AM; French DP; Baker R
BMJ; 1997 Jan; 314(7075):193-8. PubMed ID: 9022436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.
Ryan M; Farrar S
BMJ; 2000 Jun; 320(7248):1530-3. PubMed ID: 10834905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. How valid are medical records and patient questionnaires for physician profiling and health services research? A comparison with direct observation of patients visits.
Stange KC; Zyzanski SJ; Smith TF; Kelly R; Langa DM; Flocke SA; Jaén CR
Med Care; 1998 Jun; 36(6):851-67. PubMed ID: 9630127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The provision of 'same-day' care in general practice: an observational study.
Stoddart H; Evans M; Peters TJ; Salisbury C
Fam Pract; 2003 Feb; 20(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 12509369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open to suggestions.
Atkinson C; Gardner M
Health Serv J; 1991 Oct; 101(5276):29. PubMed ID: 10115395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response-ordering effects: a methodological issue in conjoint analysis.
Farrar S; Ryan M
Health Econ; 1999 Feb; 8(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 10082145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing.
Phillips KA; Maddala T; Johnson FR
Health Serv Res; 2002 Dec; 37(6):1681-705. PubMed ID: 12546292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [How well do primary care patients assess the time needed for a consultation in general medical practice?].
Stunder W; Scherer M; Himmel W
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Jan; 133(3):67-70. PubMed ID: 18186006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient satisfaction with out-of-hours primary care in the Netherlands.
van Uden CJ; Ament AJ; Hobma SO; Zwietering PJ; Crebolder HF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2005 Jan; 5(1):6. PubMed ID: 15651997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Satisfaction with out of hours primary care.
Walker N; Baker R
BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h2185. PubMed ID: 25931588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Time planning in general medical practice].
Rüter G
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Jan; 133(3):65. PubMed ID: 18186004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Controlled trial of a patient-completed history questionnaire: effects on quality of documentation and patient and physician satisfaction.
Hershey CO; Grant BJ
Am J Med Qual; 2002; 17(4):126-35. PubMed ID: 12153065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Forty-eight hour access to primary care: practice factors predicting patients' perceptions.
Campbell JL; Ramsay J; Green J; Harvey K
Fam Pract; 2005 Jun; 22(3):266-8. PubMed ID: 15778237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meeting patient expectations of care: the major determinant of satisfaction with out-of-hours primary medical care?
McKinley RK; Stevenson K; Adams S; Manku-Scott TK
Fam Pract; 2002 Aug; 19(4):333-8. PubMed ID: 12110550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The measurement of patient satisfaction.
Carr-Hill RA
J Public Health Med; 1992 Sep; 14(3):236-49. PubMed ID: 1419201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preference measurement using conjoint methods: an empirical investigation of reliability.
Bryan S; Gold L; Sheldon R; Buxton M
Health Econ; 2000 Jul; 9(5):385-95. PubMed ID: 10903539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Establishing patient preferences for gastroenterology clinic reorganization using conjoint analysis.
Moayyedi P; Wardman M; Toner J; Ryan M; Duffett S
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2002 Apr; 14(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 11943959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
