247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9683149)
1. Normal values for fundus perimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Rohrschneider K; Becker M; Schumacher N; Fendrich T; Völcker HE
Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jul; 126(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 9683149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Static fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope with an automated threshold strategy.
Rohrschneider K; Fendrich T; Becker M; Krastel H; Kruse FE; Völcker HE
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1995 Dec; 233(12):743-9. PubMed ID: 8626081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope fundus perimetry before and after laser photocoagulation for clinically significant diabetic macular edema.
Rohrschneider K; Bültmann S; Glück R; Kruse FE; Fendrich T; Völcker HE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2000 Jan; 129(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10653409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Macular automatic fundus perimetry threshold versus standard perimetry threshold.
Midena E; Radin PP; Convento E; Cavarzeran F
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 17294384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microperimetry--comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope--fundus perimetry.
Rohrschneider K; Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 15672526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Kinetic fundus controlled perimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope].
Rohrschneider K; Becker M; Fendrich T; Völcker HE
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Aug; 207(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 7474772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Fundus-controlled microperimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope in macular diseases].
Schneider U; Kuck H; Inhoffen W; Kreissig I
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 Sep; 203(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 8264213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stability of fixation: results of fundus-controlled examination using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Rohrschneider K; Becker M; Kruse FE; Fendrich T; Völcker HE
Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jul; 4(4):197-202. PubMed ID: 7492929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Static fundus perimetry in normals. Microperimeter 1 versus SLO].
Springer C; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
Ophthalmologe; 2006 Mar; 103(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 16091926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Landmark-driven fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Sunness JS; Schuchard RA; Shen N; Rubin GS; Dagnelie G; Haselwood DM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 36(9):1863-74. PubMed ID: 7635660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope microperimetry compared with Octopus perimetry in normal subjects.
Andersen MV
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1996 Apr; 74(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 8739677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scanning eye movements in homonymous hemianopia documented by scanning laser ophthalmoscope retinal perimetry.
Jamara RJ; Van De Velde F; Peli E
Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):495-504. PubMed ID: 12858085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Normal intersubject threshold variability and normal limits of the SITA SWAP and full threshold SWAP perimetric programs.
Bengtsson B; Heijl A
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 44(11):5029-34. PubMed ID: 14578431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of blue light spectrum filter on short-wavelength and standard automated perimetries.
Castro LC; de Souza CE; Soriano ES; Melo LA; Paranhos A
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2006; 69(5):725-9. PubMed ID: 17187143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fixation stability and macular light sensitivity in patients with diabetic maculopathy: a microperimetric study with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Kube T; Schmidt S; Toonen F; Kirchhof B; Wolf S
Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 15627822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnosis of retinal diseases. Comparison between multifocal ERG and fundus perimetry - a case study].
Rohrschneider K; Bültmann S; Kiel R; Weimer P; Krastel H; Blankenagel A
Ophthalmologe; 2002 Sep; 99(9):695-702. PubMed ID: 12219258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A study on retinal light sensitivity of normal human visual fields].
Yu MB; Zhou WB; Ye TC
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Sep; 30(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 7805534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fixation pattern in healthy subjects during microperimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.
Källmark FP; Ygge J
Med Sci Monit; 2008 Jun; 14(6):CR311-315. PubMed ID: 18509274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Long-term and Short-term Fluctuations of Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry Between Peripheral and Paracentral Zones of Visual Field.
Khan FA; Ishaq M; Yaqub A
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2017 Mar; 27(3):140-144. PubMed ID: 28406771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
