127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9683289)
1. Quantification and prognostic relevance of angiogenic parameters in invasive cervical cancer.
Tjalma W; Van Marck E; Weyler J; Dirix L; Van Daele A; Goovaerts G; Albertyn G; van Dam P
Br J Cancer; 1998 Jul; 78(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 9683289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Angiogenesis in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Kaku T; Hirakawa T; Kamura T; Amada S; Kinukawa N; Kobayashi H; Sakai K; Ariyoshi K; Sonoda K; Nakano H
Cancer; 1998 Oct; 83(7):1384-90. PubMed ID: 9762940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Association between host tissue vascularity and the prognostically relevant tumor vascularity in human cervical cancer.
Höckel S; Schlenger K; Vaupel P; Höckel M
Int J Oncol; 2001 Oct; 19(4):827-32. PubMed ID: 11562762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic significance of intratumour microvessel density and haemoglobin level in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Gasinska A; Urbanski K; Adamczyk A; Pudelek J; Lind BK; Brahme A
Acta Oncol; 2002; 41(5):437-43. PubMed ID: 12442919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Macrophage infiltration and angiogenesis in cervical squamous cell carcinoma--clinicopathologic correlation.
Davidson B; Goldberg I; Gotlieb WH; Lerner-Geva L; Ben-Baruch G; Agulansky L; Novikov I; Kopolovic J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Mar; 78(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 10078587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of tumour microvessel density in cancer of the uterine cervix stage IB to IIB.
Kainz C; Speiser P; Wanner C; Obermair A; Tempfer C; Sliutz G; Reinthaller A; Breitenecker G
Anticancer Res; 1995; 15(4):1549-51. PubMed ID: 7544572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic value of bcl-2 expression in patients with operable carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Tjalma W; Weyler J; Goovaerts G; De Pooter C; Van Marck E; van Dam P
J Clin Pathol; 1997 Jan; 50(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 9059353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitation and prognostic value of breast cancer angiogenesis: comparison of microvessel density, Chalkley count, and computer image analysis.
Fox SB; Leek RD; Weekes MP; Whitehouse RM; Gatter KC; Harris AL
J Pathol; 1995 Nov; 177(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 8551390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Detection of angiogenesis-dependent parameters by functional MRI: correlation with histomorphology and evaluation of clinical relevance as prognostic factor using cervix carcinoma as an example].
Hawighorst H; Schaeffer U; Knapstein PG; Knopp MV; Weikel W; Schönberg SO; Essig M; van Kaick G
Rofo; 1998 Nov; 169(5):499-504. PubMed ID: 9849600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determination of tumour prognosis based on angiogenesis-related vascular patterns measured by fractal and syntactic structure analysis.
Weyn B; Tjalma WA; Vermeylen P; van Daele A; Van Marck E; Jacob W
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2004 Jun; 16(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 15214656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumour vascularity is a significant prognostic factor for cervix carcinoma treated with radiotherapy: independence from tumour radiosensitivity.
Cooper RA; West CM; Wilks DP; Logue JP; Davidson SE; Roberts SA; Hunter RD
Br J Cancer; 1999 Sep; 81(2):354-8. PubMed ID: 10496365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification and prognostic relevance of angiogenic parameters in invasive cervical cancer.
Güllü IH; Marangoz S
Br J Cancer; 1999 Aug; 80(11):1865. PubMed ID: 10468311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Endothelial area as a prognostic indicator for invasive breast carcinoma.
Simpson JF; Ahn C; Battifora H; Esteban JM
Cancer; 1996 May; 77(10):2077-85. PubMed ID: 8640673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tumor angiogenesis as a prognostic factor in cervical carcinoma.
Wiggins DL; Granai CO; Steinhoff MM; Calabresi P
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):353-6. PubMed ID: 7535719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thrombospondin-1 and -2 messenger RNA expression in invasive cervical cancer: correlation with angiogenesis and prognosis.
Kodama J; Hashimoto I; Seki N; Hongo A; Yoshinouchi M; Okuda H; Kudo T
Clin Cancer Res; 2001 Sep; 7(9):2826-31. PubMed ID: 11555600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tumor vascularity--a novel prognostic factor in advanced cervical carcinoma.
Schlenger K; Höckel M; Mitze M; Schäffer U; Weikel W; Knapstein PG; Lambert A
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Oct; 59(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 7557616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Angiogenic activity of cervical carcinoma: assessment by functional magnetic resonance imaging-based parameters and a histomorphological approach in correlation with disease outcome.
Hawighorst H; Weikel W; Knapstein PG; Knopp MV; Zuna I; Schönberg SO; Vaupel P; van Kaick G
Clin Cancer Res; 1998 Oct; 4(10):2305-12. PubMed ID: 9796959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lymphatic vessel density as a prognostic marker in clinical stage I endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Saad RS; Ismiil N; Ghorab Z; Nofech-Mozes S; Dubé V; Covens A; Khalifa MA
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2010 Jul; 29(4):386-93. PubMed ID: 20567154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High Expression of CCDC34 Is Associated with Poor Survival in Cervical Cancer Patients.
Liu LB; Huang J; Zhong JP; Ye GL; Xue L; Zhou MH; Huang G; Li SJ
Med Sci Monit; 2018 Nov; 24():8383-8390. PubMed ID: 30458457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cap43/NDRG1/Drg-1 is a molecular target for angiogenesis and a prognostic indicator in cervical adenocarcinoma.
Nishio S; Ushijima K; Tsuda N; Takemoto S; Kawano K; Yamaguchi T; Nishida N; Kakuma T; Tsuda H; Kasamatsu T; Sasajima Y; Kage M; Kuwano M; Kamura T
Cancer Lett; 2008 Jun; 264(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18281151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
