These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9685035)

  • 1. Electrode position and the multi-focal visual-evoked potential: role in objective visual field assessment.
    Klistorner AI; Graham SL; Grigg JR; Billson FA
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1998 May; 26 Suppl 1():S91-4. PubMed ID: 9685035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects.
    Klistorner AI; Graham SL; Grigg JR; Billson FA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 May; 39(6):937-50. PubMed ID: 9579473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multifocal pattern VEP perimetry: analysis of sectoral waveforms.
    Klistorner AI; Graham SL
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1999; 98(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 10947003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation of topographic visually evoked potentials across the visual field.
    Yu MZ; Brown B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 9135809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Steady-state multifocal visual evoked potential (ssmfVEP) using dartboard stimulation as a possible tool for objective visual field assessment.
    Horn FK; Selle F; Hohberger B; Kremers J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 254(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 26553198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective perimetry in glaucoma.
    Klistorner A; Graham SL
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Dec; 107(12):2283-99. PubMed ID: 11097611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs.
    Fortune B; Hood DC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1364-75. PubMed ID: 12601070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Topographic mapping of the visual evoked potential after source derivation.
    Carreño-Rimaudo SV; Catelli-Infantosi AF
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):5-13. PubMed ID: 7968865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pattern-onset stimulation boosts central multifocal VEP responses.
    Hoffmann MB; Straube S; Bach M
    J Vis; 2003; 3(6):432-9. PubMed ID: 12901714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The topographic distribution of the magnetic P100M to full- and half-field stimulation.
    Harding G; Janday B; Armstrong R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 80(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 1505340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The application of Laplacian analysis in the recording of half-field pattern-onset evoked potentials.
    Riemslag FC; Beers AP; Spekreijse H
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 80(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 1505341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual evoked magnetic responses to central and peripheral stimulation: simultaneous VEP recordings.
    Brecelj J; Kakigi R; Koyama S; Hoshiyama M
    Brain Topogr; 1998; 10(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 9562544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: effect on intersubject amplitude variability.
    Klistorner AI; Graham SL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Aug; 42(9):2145-52. PubMed ID: 11481284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal frequency dependence of the polarity inversion between upper and lower visual field in the pattern-onset steady-state visual evoked potential.
    Kessler R; Heinrich SP
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 146(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 36272048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 32-channel mouse EEG: Visual evoked potentials.
    Land R; Kapche A; Ebbers L; Kral A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Sep; 325():108316. PubMed ID: 31251949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The VEP thresholds for full-field stimuli in dark-adapted infants.
    Hansen RM; Fulton AB
    Vis Neurosci; 1995; 12(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 7786844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field.
    Baseler HA; Sutter EE; Klein SA; Carney T
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 Jan; 90(1):65-81. PubMed ID: 7509275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials.
    Balachandran C; Klistorner AI; Graham SL
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2003 Mar; 106(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 12678283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of hemifield stimulation on simultaneous steady-state pattern reversal electroretinogram and visual evoked response.
    Katsumi O; Tetsuka S; Mehta MC; Tetsuka H; Hirose T
    Ophthalmic Res; 1993; 25(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 8321516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multifocal magnetoencephalogram applied to objective visual field analysis.
    Nishiyama T; Ohde H; Haruta Y; Mashima Y; Oguchi Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2004; 48(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 15064972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.