135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9685536)
1. Does the ultrasonically activated scalpel release viable airborne cancer cells?
Nduka CC; Poland N; Kennedy M; Dye J; Darzi A
Surg Endosc; 1998 Aug; 12(8):1031-4. PubMed ID: 9685536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Viability of Airborne Tumor Cells during Excision by Ultrasonic Device.
Hashimoto M; Kobayashi T; Tashiro H; Kuroda S; Mikuriya Y; Abe T; Tanaka Y; Ohdan H
Surg Res Pract; 2017; 2017():4907576. PubMed ID: 28492061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative adhesion formation in a rabbit model: monopolar electrosurgery versus ultrasonic scalpel.
Vetere PF; Lazarou G; Apostol R; Khullar P; Okonkwo L; Nezhat F
JSLS; 2015; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 26005316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of experimental nerve injury caused by ultrasonically activated scalpel and electrosurgery.
Carlander J; Johansson K; Lindström S; Velin AK; Jiang CH; Nordborg C
Br J Surg; 2005 Jun; 92(6):772-7. PubMed ID: 15856482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental study of the potential hazards of surgical smoke from powered instruments.
In SM; Park DY; Sohn IK; Kim CH; Lim HL; Hong SA; Jung DY; Jeong SY; Han JH; Kim HJ
Br J Surg; 2015 Nov; 102(12):1581-6. PubMed ID: 26331459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Experimental study of monopolar electrical and ultrasonic dissection].
Antonutti R; Fontes-Dislaire I; Rumeau JL; Mutter D; Fourtanier G
Ann Chir; 2001 May; 126(4):330-5. PubMed ID: 11413813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Energy sources for laparoscopic colectomy: a prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, bipolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative outcome and costs analysis.
Targarona EM; Balague C; Marin J; Neto RB; Martinez C; Garriga J; Trias M
Surg Innov; 2005 Dec; 12(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 16424955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of steel scalpel, ultrasonic scalpel, CO2 laser, and monopolar and bipolar electrosurgery on wound healing in guinea pig oral mucosa.
Sinha UK; Gallagher LA
Laryngoscope; 2003 Feb; 113(2):228-36. PubMed ID: 12567074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized phase II study of the clinical effects of ultrasonically activated coagulating shears (Harmonic scalpel) in open gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Kawabata R; Takiguchi S; Kimura Y; Imamura H; Fujita J; Tamura S; Fujitani K; Kishi K; Yamamoto K; Fujiwara S; Kurokawa Y; Mori M; Doki Y
Surg Today; 2016 May; 46(5):561-8. PubMed ID: 26198895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Surgical Smoke Generated During Electrosurgery with Aerosolized Particulates from Ultrasonic and High-Speed Cutting.
Casey VJ; Martin C; Curtin P; Buckley K; McNamara LM
Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Feb; 49(2):560-572. PubMed ID: 32770304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantifying inadvertent thermal bowel injury from the monopolar instrument.
Martin KE; Moore CM; Tucker R; Fuchshuber P; Robinson T
Surg Endosc; 2016 Nov; 30(11):4776-4784. PubMed ID: 27129548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical application of an ultrasonically activated scalpel in neurosurgery.
Kawamata T; Iseki H; Okada Y; Hori T
Neurol Res; 2001 Jan; 23(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 11210432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of histopathologic margin assessment after steel scalpel, monopolar electrosurgery, and ultrasonic scalpel glossectomy in a rat model.
Kakarala K; Faquin WC; Deschler DG
Laryngoscope; 2010; 120 Suppl 4():S155. PubMed ID: 21225753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acute and subacute effects of the ultrasonic blade and electrosurgery on nerve physiology.
Chen C; Kallakuri S; Cavanaugh JM; Broughton D; Clymer JW
Br J Neurosurg; 2015; 29(4):569-73. PubMed ID: 25812024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of glossectomy technique on histopathologic assessment in a rat model.
Kakarala K; Faquin WC; Deschler DG
Head Neck; 2011 Nov; 33(11):1576-80. PubMed ID: 21990222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 200 consecutive patients using an ultrasonically activated scalpel.
Amaral JF
Surg Laparosc Endosc; 1995 Aug; 5(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 7551275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental analyses of the cavitation generated by ultrasonically activated surgical devices.
Gao T; Lau BE; Yamaguchi T; Hanari N; Gunji H; Kano M; Matsubara H; Hayashi H
Surg Today; 2017 Jan; 47(1):122-129. PubMed ID: 27154459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic intracorporeal bowel resection with ultrasound versus electrosurgical dissection.
Bergamaschi R; Marvik R
JSLS; 2001; 5(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 11303990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative healing of rat fascia following incision with three surgical instruments.
Chang EI; Carlson GA; Vose JG; Huang EJ; Yang GP
J Surg Res; 2011 May; 167(1):e47-54. PubMed ID: 21324486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of Ultrasonic Harmonic Scalpel for Real-Time Tissue Identification Using Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry.
Manoli E; Mason S; Ford L; Adebesin A; Bodai Z; Darzi A; Kinross J; Takats Z
Anal Chem; 2021 Apr; 93(14):5906-5916. PubMed ID: 33787247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
