BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

604 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9685708)

  • 1. Heritable and cancer risks of exposures to anticancer drugs: inter-species comparisons of covalent deoxyribonucleic acid-binding agents.
    Vogel EW; Barbin A; Nivard MJ; Stack HF; Waters MD; Lohman PH
    Mutat Res; 1998 May; 400(1-2):509-40. PubMed ID: 9685708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA damage and repair in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis: implications of structure-activity relationships for cross-species extrapolation.
    Vogel EW; Nivard MJ; Ballering LA; Bartsch H; Barbin A; Nair J; Comendador MA; Sierra LM; Aguirrezabalaga I; Tosal L; Ehrenberg L; Fuchs RP; Janel-Bintz R; Maenhaut-Michel G; Montesano R; Hall J; Kang H; Miele M; Thomale J; Bender K; Engelbergs J; Rajewsky MF
    Mutat Res; 1996 Jun; 353(1-2):177-218. PubMed ID: 8692191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DNA damage and repair in somatic and germ cells in vivo.
    Vogel EW; Natarajan AT
    Mutat Res; 1995 Aug; 330(1-2):183-208. PubMed ID: 7623865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotoxicity of 1,3-butadiene and its epoxy intermediates.
    Walker VE; Walker DM; Meng Q; McDonald JD; Scott BR; Seilkop SK; Claffey DJ; Upton PB; Powley MW; Swenberg JA; Henderson RF;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Aug; (144):3-79. PubMed ID: 20017413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. The subtlety of alkylating agents in reactions with biological macromolecules.
    Vogel EW; Nivard MJ
    Mutat Res; 1994 Feb; 305(1):13-32. PubMed ID: 7508544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Qualitative and quantitative procedures for health risk assessment.
    Lohman PH
    Mutat Res; 1999 Jul; 428(1-2):237-54. PubMed ID: 10517997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hydroquinone: an evaluation of the human risks from its carcinogenic and mutagenic properties.
    McGregor D
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007; 37(10):887-914. PubMed ID: 18027166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genotoxic effects of inhaled ethylene oxide, propylene oxide and butylene oxide on germ cells: sensitivity of genetic endpoints in relation to dose and repair status.
    Vogel EW; Nivard MJ
    Mutat Res; 1998 Sep; 405(2):259-71. PubMed ID: 9748619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The performance of short-term tests in identifying potential germ cell mutagens: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA; Bridges BA; Adler ID
    Mutat Res; 1994 Dec; 341(2):109-31. PubMed ID: 7527489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals-new aspects to be considered in a European perspective.
    Bolt HM; Foth H; Hengstler JG; Degen GH
    Toxicol Lett; 2004 Jun; 151(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 15177638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term tests for defining mutagenic carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Stack HF; Jackson MA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):499-536. PubMed ID: 10353401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative comparative mutagenesis in bacteria, mammalian cells, and animal-mediated assays. A convenient way of estimating genotoxic activity in vivo?
    Mohn GR; van Zeeland AA
    Mutat Res; 1985; 150(1-2):159-75. PubMed ID: 3889614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic activity profiles of anticancer drugs.
    Jackson MA; Stack HF; Waters MD
    Mutat Res; 1996 Aug; 355(1-2):171-208. PubMed ID: 8781583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence of genotoxic chemicals among animal and human carcinogens evaluated in the IARC Monograph Series.
    Bartsch H; Malaveille C
    Cell Biol Toxicol; 1989 Jun; 5(2):115-27. PubMed ID: 2766027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrated approach to testing and assessment for predicting rodent genotoxic carcinogenicity.
    Petkov PI; Schultz TW; Donner EM; Honma M; Morita T; Hamada S; Wakata A; Mishima M; Maniwa J; Todorov M; Kaloyanova E; Kotov S; Mekenyan OG
    J Appl Toxicol; 2016 Dec; 36(12):1536-1550. PubMed ID: 27225589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The in vivo genetic activity profile of the monofunctional nitrogen mustard 2-chloroethylamine differs drastically from its bifunctional counterpart mechlorethamine.
    Wijen JP; Nivard MJ; Vogel EW
    Carcinogenesis; 2000 Oct; 21(10):1859-67. PubMed ID: 11023544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of carcinogenic and in vivo genotoxic potency estimates.
    Sanner T; Dybing E
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2005 Feb; 96(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 15679476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.